Comparing the image of a human lip impressed on an object associated with a crime scene, such as a glass, paper cup, or other surface, with that of the lips of a suspect, has been asserted by crime scene investigators to offer potentially useful evidence in identifying defendants in criminal cases. Often, it has been suggested that such traces have individualization value, though little scientific research has been published on the topic. No books or scientific literature exists examining the persistence of lip creases; and there is little information to be found on how similar or different such crease markings may be among people. Nor have generally accepted examination methodologies been described and tested.
Although frequently mentioned in criminal investigation books as providing valid evidence of identity, lip impressions have rarely featured in actual casework, because the technique is not one of the recognized forensic disciplines.
This article discusses the only appellate court decision in a criminal case involving the admissibility of evidence of a lip print comparison; it also considers the evidentiary standard by which admissibility has been judged.