2020
DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-19-485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminary study highlights the potential of immune checkpoint inhibitors in sarcomatoid mesothelioma

Abstract: Background: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is well known as an aggressive disease with poor survival. This has sparked trials of alternate immune-based therapies in MPM. While up to a quarter of MPM patients respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), predicting response remains challenging and PD-L1 expression alone has been deemed insufficient. Additionally, patients with sarcomatoid MPM are often excluded from trials utilizing ICIs due to their rapid progression. Here, we analyze the association o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(11 reference statements)
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the data from Checkpoint-743 it would seem that nivolumab/ipilimumab should be used in the first line setting, however, cost reimbursement may limit their uptake [ 194 ]. The issue of whether or not to give it to all comers irrespective of histology and PD-L1 status has however yet to be resolved given the data that suggests PD-L1 negative tumors have better responses to chemotherapy, and that patients with the sarcomatoid histology may be better candidates for checkpoint inhibitors [ 53 , 153 , 195 ]. Indeed it may be that PD-L1 negative non-sarcomatoid patients should initially be treated with a chemotherapy regimen and then proceed to a checkpoint inhibitor in the salvage setting upon progression, whilst PD-L1 positive patients should be offered first-line nivolumab/ipilimumab.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the data from Checkpoint-743 it would seem that nivolumab/ipilimumab should be used in the first line setting, however, cost reimbursement may limit their uptake [ 194 ]. The issue of whether or not to give it to all comers irrespective of histology and PD-L1 status has however yet to be resolved given the data that suggests PD-L1 negative tumors have better responses to chemotherapy, and that patients with the sarcomatoid histology may be better candidates for checkpoint inhibitors [ 53 , 153 , 195 ]. Indeed it may be that PD-L1 negative non-sarcomatoid patients should initially be treated with a chemotherapy regimen and then proceed to a checkpoint inhibitor in the salvage setting upon progression, whilst PD-L1 positive patients should be offered first-line nivolumab/ipilimumab.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, there is evidence that the ratio of CTLs to malignant cells is higher in sarcomatoid MPM. 24 Furthermore, by examining paired biopsies, Pasello and coworkers detected that the CD8 + cell proportion increased following administration of platinum plus pemetrexed. 25 Finally, our own group has recently demonstrated via multiregional sequencing that CTL infiltration can be influenced by the tumor's clonal architecture.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UJIIE et al [114] showed that a high CD163+ tumour-associated macrophages/CD8+ T lymphocytes ratio and a low CD163+/CD20+ B lymphocytes ratios were independent prognostic factors of worse and better survival outcomes, respectively. Non-epithelioid histologies have been more frequently characterised by higher CD8+ density and CD45RO+ memory cells, while epithelioid one has higher amounts of peritumoural CD4+ T and CD20+ B lymphocytes [115,116]. PD-L1 expression has been shown to correlate with the presence of CD68+ macrophages [117], CD45+ immune cells, activated CD3+ T cells, proliferating CD8+ T cells and FOXP3+/CD4+ Treg lymphocytes [118].…”
Section: Malignant Pleural Mesotheliomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, due the immune-pathological features (described in the previous Section), sarcomatoid and biphasic histologies were supposed being the more prone to immunotherapy action. Albeit some data sustained this hypothesis [116,126,127], non-epithelioid MPM cases included in clinical trials or retrospective series were too scant to drive any conclusion. Of major relevance, the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab in MPM has been recently proven superior to first-line chemotherapy in terms of OS benefit.…”
Section: Histology and Pd-l1 Expression As Biomarkers In Pleural Mesothelioma Patients Receiving Icismentioning
confidence: 99%