Monitoring Ecological Condition at Regional Scales 1998
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-4976-1_37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminary Studies on the Population Genetics of the Central Stoneroller (Campostoma anomalum) from the Great Miami River Basin, Ohio

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To illustrate the magnitude of the effect of the bias in Lynch’s estimator on P ‐values for tests comparing within‐group diversities, we re‐analysed some published data from our laboratory on central stonerollers ( Campostoma anomalum ) taken from six different streams (Silbiger et al . 1998).…”
Section: Lynch’s Methods and A Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To illustrate the magnitude of the effect of the bias in Lynch’s estimator on P ‐values for tests comparing within‐group diversities, we re‐analysed some published data from our laboratory on central stonerollers ( Campostoma anomalum ) taken from six different streams (Silbiger et al . 1998).…”
Section: Lynch’s Methods and A Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The likelihood of population persistence can depend on the quality of available habitat (Hanski & Gilpin, (Bonnel & Selander, 1974;Allendorf & Leary, 1986;Frankham, 1995;Lynch, 1996;Newman & Pilson, 1997;Saccheri et al, 1998;Westemeier et al, 1998). A prior study of central stonerollers in catchments near Mill Creek found lower genetic diversity within populations occupying poor habitat compared to populations in less impaired habitat (Silbiger, Christ & Leonard, 1998). Gillespie & Guttman (1989) suggested that the allele and genotype frequency shifts they observed in central stoneroller populations were due to selection induced by environmental contaminants.…”
Section: Population Persistence and Habitat Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These tools provide indicative measures for the status and trends of species to be used as sentinels in assessing ecosystem health. Changes in these indicators can occur in populations at stressor levels that have little effect on the functioning of the ecosystem [62] and at a point when the stressor impact may be reversible [63]. In developing molecular techniques as monitoring tools, we have pursued the use of population genetic diversity and structure as indicators for vulnerability to exposure in an aquatic setting.…”
Section: Population Genetic Structure As An Indicatormentioning
confidence: 99%