1990
DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199001000-00006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminary Studies of Mineralization During Distraction Osteogenesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

4
117
0
4

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 200 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
117
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In their study. the fixator used was ;I rigid unilateral frame and the lag period befure distraction was 10 days instead of the 7 days used i n other studies (Aronson et al 1990. Delloye et al 1900.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their study. the fixator used was ;I rigid unilateral frame and the lag period befure distraction was 10 days instead of the 7 days used i n other studies (Aronson et al 1990. Delloye et al 1900.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The site of the osteotomy also influences callus formation. Fewer complications were observed when the osteotomy was metaphyseal (1,4,7,9,13,(15)(16)(17)(18); this seems to be related to the presence of spongy bone, which consolidates easily; the existence of fewer muscular insertions; and the fact that less damage is done to the vascularization, particularly the medullary artery, which is highly ramified at this point. The latter has been demonstrated by angiographic studies (2,15), which show that diaphyseal corticotomy interrupts the endomedullary vessels in 90% of cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The osteotomy should be performed in the least traumatic way possible, with conservation of the periosteum, medullary vascularization, and soft tissues: these are important factors in the formation of high-quality callus, as has been shown in various experimental and clinical reports (1,2,6,12,14,16,17,19,23,25). The site of the osteotomy also influences callus formation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Quantitative methods for evaluation of bone volume and mineral content include dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and quantitative computed tomography (QCT). These techniques quantify the absolute value or changes in bone mineral density compared to standards, and both DEXA [16,22,30,33] and QCT [2,3,18,26] have been used during the distraction and consolidation periods. However, these techniques (especially QCT) may involve large radiation doses to the patient.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%