Preliminary Sizing of an Hypersonic Airbreathing Airliner

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to identify, for given technology levels (TRL) and mission requirements, those parameters that are critical for preliminary sizing of a hypersonic airbreathing airliner. Mission requirements will dictate a solution space of possible vehicle architecture capable of meeting cruise conditions as well as of taking-off (TO) and landing. In practice, once defined a range of cruise vehicle architectures, constraints are imposed (as to all passenger airliners), such as: 1. take off (=TO) and landing distance (so-called field length, FL): FL no longer than for the B-747-400, or 10000 ft; 2. completing TO with one engine off; 3. max acceleration at TO and climb-out (CO) = 0.4 g; 4. Hydrogen fuel (Meeting NOx emission limits (EINOx) is a further constraint not discussed in this paper).These constraints enable focusing on a realistic design out of the broad range of vehicles capable of performing the given mission. Thus a realistic vehicle must not only integrate aerodynamics and propulsion system; in fact, it is the result of many iterations in the design space, until performance and constraints are successfully achieved and met.The Gross Weight at Take Off (TOGW) was deliberately discarded as a constraint, based on Previous studies by Czysz. Typically, limiting from the beginning the TOGW leads to a vicious spiral where weight and propulsion system requirements keep growing, eventually denying convergence. In designing passenger airliners, in fact, it is the payload that is assumed fixed from the start, not the total weight.A parametric analysis of the hypersonic vehicle architecture is presented: in particular, optimal size, weight and geometrical shape are defined for different mission requirements. This analysis has shown that, it is possible to define a range of possible successful solutions for the European LAPCAT II project.

Feasibility of high speed atmospheric flight on Venus

“…Sizing begins with assuming mission distance, payload and cruise Mach number, to obtain a figure of merit (called Küchemann's τ) of the whole vehicle, with tot 1.5 plan V S τ = This τ is therefore a slenderness parameter, determining the compromise between high planform area(high lift but also high friction drag) and high volume (high fuel and payload mass but also high wave drag). The VDK sizing methodology is based on the simultaneously solution for the OWE (overall weight empty) and Splan equations, ensuring that the separately calculated available and required weights and volumes converge for a given τ parameter [7][8][9]. In fact, all variables in these calculations are strictly and non linearly connected to each other: For example, if the range increases, the propellant weight also increases, driving up the weight of all systems and of the structure.…”

Flight in the Jovian Stratosphere: Engine Concept and Flight Altitude Determination

“…Since during steady flight the thrust equals the drag, the lift can be calculated from the thrust, if the lift-to-drag -L/D ratio is known. The maximum L/D ratio 𝑘 𝑚𝑎𝑥 can be calculated from the Kuchemann's relationship [14]:…”

Sizing of a Fully Integrated Hypersonic Commercial Airliner

“…Its mission requirements are those of a long haul commercial airliner burning hydrogen [9] and flying at Mach (M) 8: 300 passengers, with an unrefueled 18,728 km range (constraints imposed are those of existing airliners). The first step of this approach is to define a convergence space solution at the cruise design point (see [10][11] by these authors). Once a feasible cruise space solution [10], the second step [11] is the integration of the overall mission, i.e., from take off (TO) to landing.…”