2013
DOI: 10.1029/gm005p0257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminary Results on the Aggregation of Ice Crystals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although not directly part of SIP, ice aggregation is another process that impacts N i and may therefore be important in affecting high IWC. There are several different approaches to parameterize the ice collection efficiency, which is a key parameter in the aggregation parameterization (Hallgren and Hosler, 1960;Lin et al 1983;Cotton et al, 1986;Ferrier et al, 1994Ferrier et al, , 1995Milbrandt and Yau, 2005a, b;Seifert and Beheng, 2006). Khain and Pinsky (2018) showed that the collection efficiencies in these parameterizations vary by more than 2 orders of magnitude for any given temperature between −40 and 0 • C. Sensitivity simulations conducted in the framework of this current study showed a high sensitivity of the modelled IWC and N i to the collection efficiency of ice.…”
Section: Ice Collection Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although not directly part of SIP, ice aggregation is another process that impacts N i and may therefore be important in affecting high IWC. There are several different approaches to parameterize the ice collection efficiency, which is a key parameter in the aggregation parameterization (Hallgren and Hosler, 1960;Lin et al 1983;Cotton et al, 1986;Ferrier et al, 1994Ferrier et al, , 1995Milbrandt and Yau, 2005a, b;Seifert and Beheng, 2006). Khain and Pinsky (2018) showed that the collection efficiencies in these parameterizations vary by more than 2 orders of magnitude for any given temperature between −40 and 0 • C. Sensitivity simulations conducted in the framework of this current study showed a high sensitivity of the modelled IWC and N i to the collection efficiency of ice.…”
Section: Ice Collection Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The significantly larger values of aggregation number in the D12 case compared to the other cases ( Fig. 8a-d) is a result of the greater number concentration of ice crystals forming at warmer temperatures where particle "sticking" efficiency is higher (Hallgren and Hosler, 1960). While aggregation is the primary precipitation process in the stratiform regime, the aggregation numbers in this regime are smaller than in the convective regime.…”
Section: Effects On Convective Psds and Collection Processesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Earlier observations also provide some evidence of collection efficiency. Laboratory study conducted by Hallgren and Hosler (1960) unveiled a peak aggregation efficiency of 0.1∼0.2 at 15℃, and progressively declined to 0.06∼0.03 across 5∼-25℃. Results from an ice cloud chamber used in Connolly et al (2012) indicated a maximum collection efficiency of 0.2∼0.6 at 15℃ with a gradual reduction on either side of this temperature.…”
Section: Parameterizations Of Collection Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 98%