Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Tri-Service Conference on the Biological Effects of Microwave Radiation 1961
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-5627-9_24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminary Results of Studies of the Lenticular Effects of Microwaves Among Exposed Personnel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

1966
1966
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Age was considered important since earlier studies had indicated that subcataractous lens defects appeared to increase with normal aging of the lens. 9 Man-for-man age matching of exposed and controls would have eliminated age differences but, due to sampling restrictions, this was not possible. The control group was 14% smaller than the group of microwave workers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Age was considered important since earlier studies had indicated that subcataractous lens defects appeared to increase with normal aging of the lens. 9 Man-for-man age matching of exposed and controls would have eliminated age differences but, due to sampling restrictions, this was not possible. The control group was 14% smaller than the group of microwave workers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Even category for each lens. 9 An "eye score" (Y), the if such a dose estimate could be obtained, it would…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They did note a statistically significant increase in posterior polar defects. (39) ZARET et al reported a study of 475 exposed personnel and 359 controls in which a slight, but statistically significant, increase in lenticular defects were noted in the exposed group. These consisted of posterior polar defects, opacification, minute defects and relucency.…”
Section: Energy Absorption I N Tissuementioning
confidence: 95%
“…The case, therefore, would not appear to be conclusive of a cataractogenic effect of long-term, high-level microwave exposure (Milroy and Michaelson, 1972). Zaret and Eisenbud (1961) selected 67 age-matched pairs as a subgroup for statistical analysis. They used a semiquantitative scoring method (rated 0-3) to describe findings and used a chi-square test of the differences between the number of microwave workers with the same, lower, or higher scores.…”
Section: Ocular Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More complete follow-up of the Zaret and Eisenbud (1961) study was reported by Cleary and Pasternack (1966). Multiple regression techniques were used.…”
Section: Ocular Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%