Koerber et al. present a single-institution retrospective analysis of the incidence of nodal involvement in 280 men with newly diagnosed intermediate-and (mostly) high-risk prostate cancer who underwent prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT as a part of primary staging. These diagnoses were pathologically validated by subsequent lymphadenectomy, and the investigators compared the observed incidence of lymph node involvement (LNI) with the incidence predicted by the Roach equation (1) by comparing the sensitivity and specificity. The bottom line was that the results appeared to be virtually identical. However, as usual, things are not quite that simple. The Roach equation, first derived in the early 1990s, uses a simple equation derived from the Partin nomogram to estimate the risk of LNI in prostate cancer, as follows: LNI risk (%) 5 2/3 • PSA [(Gleason score 2 6) • 10] (2,3). This was validated in a crossinstitutional study of nearly 300 patients between 1987 and 1991, and subsequently this equation has been used in several major randomized clinical trials including Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 94-13 (4) and 09-24 to evaluate the role of elective pelvic nodal irradiation in the definitive management of patients with prostate cancer. This evaluation is important because some studies suggest that prophylactic whole-pelvis radiotherapy may decrease treatment failure rates and improve biochemical-relapse-free survival (4,5), though not necessarily disease-free or overall survival (6). However, whether there is a survival benefit added by elective pelvic nodal irradiation awaits the now fully accrued phase III Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 09-24 trial, which enrolled over 2,500 patients with the goal of providing a definitive answer as to the degree of clinical benefit and toxicity of elective whole-pelvis radiotherapy in men with intermediate-risk and high-risk prostate cancer. However, the accuracy and clinical value of the Roach equation has been called into question. Some studies, including several studies using institutional data and data from large cohorts such as the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, have reported that the Roach equation overestimates the risk of LNI (based on nodal findings at the time of prostatectomy) (7,8). This