Advanced Peripheral Nerve Surgery and Minimal Invasive Spinal Surgery
DOI: 10.1007/3-211-27458-8_28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminary results of a soft novel lumbar intervertebral prothesis (DIAM) in the degenerative spinal pathology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
29
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinical reports have provided promising early data for a number of different interspinous implants including the X-stop [12,16], DIAM [7], and Wallis [9] for degenerative spinal conditions. Four-year results were obtained for the longest followed of these implants [5] and demonstrated an improved quality of life versus non-operative management [3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Clinical reports have provided promising early data for a number of different interspinous implants including the X-stop [12,16], DIAM [7], and Wallis [9] for degenerative spinal conditions. Four-year results were obtained for the longest followed of these implants [5] and demonstrated an improved quality of life versus non-operative management [3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lumbar interspinous spacers, although not a new concept [14], is such an alternative for use in the degenerative conditions such as spinal canal and foraminal stenosis [5,12,16], segmental instability [1], and back pain [7,9]. Theoretically the implants are designed to unload the facet joints, and indirectly decompress the spinal canal or intervertebral foramen by providing distraction through the spinous processes and limiting extension at the implanted segment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mariotti et al 50 had already described a positive result when studying the quality of life of a group of patients with lumbar stenosis that had surgery with interspinous systems, having however used the Dallas Pain Questionnaire. The following year, Hsu et al 51 confirmed that described by Mariotti, finding significant improvement in SF-36, studying patients with the same pathology operated with an identical technique.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is currently not FDA-approved; however, the US FDA-regulated clinical trial was already initiated in late 2006. Despite rates of postoperative patient satisfaction ranging from 87.5% to 97% at 12 to 17.7 months [5,10,19], complications such as spinous process fracture, infection, recurrent or residual disc protrusion, and newonset radiculopathy have been reported [5,10,19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interspinous spacers (ISPs) have been designed with the concept of distracting adjacent spinous processes, unloading the intervertebral disc, blocking spinal extension, and improving central canal and neuroforaminal stenosis. Although improvement in visual analog scale score and functional scores have been reported in many studies [5,10,19], complications such as Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article. Each author certifies that his or her institution approved the human protocol for this investigation, that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and that informed consent for participation in the study was obtained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%