2000
DOI: 10.3133/ofr00258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminary report on aggregate use and permitting along the Colorado Front Range

Abstract: Introduction 1 Acknowledgements 2 Types of aggregate resources in the Colorado Front Range 2 Sand and gravel 2 Crushed stone 2 Resource availability 3 Producing aggregates for use 4 History of Colorado aggregate production 5 History of Colorado Front Range aggregate resource accessibility 7 Future production of aggregates 9 Future supply of aggregates in the Colorado Front Range 14 Sand and gravel 14 Crushed stone 16 Recycling 17 Discussion 18 Summary 20 Conclusions 20 References 21

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, during 1997, only 55 percent of the aggregates demand in the Denver area was being met from sand and gravel sources while 31 percent was being met from crushed stone. The remaining 14 percent of the aggregate was derived from recycled concrete or asphalt (Wilburn and Langer, 2000).…”
Section: History Of Quarrying In the Denver Colorado Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, during 1997, only 55 percent of the aggregates demand in the Denver area was being met from sand and gravel sources while 31 percent was being met from crushed stone. The remaining 14 percent of the aggregate was derived from recycled concrete or asphalt (Wilburn and Langer, 2000).…”
Section: History Of Quarrying In the Denver Colorado Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Aggregate mining in the Colorado Front Range area takes place primarily within two distinct hydrogeologic settings: (1) alluvial sand and gravel deposits in the Colorado Piedmont and (2) fractured crystalline rock in the Rocky Mountains. About two-thirds of the aggregate in the Front Range area is sand and gravel from alluvium and about one-third is crushed stone from fractured crystalline rock (Wilburn and Langer, 2000).…”
Section: Hydrogeologic Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1529, increased demand, inadequate grain size to meet specifications, and environmental and visual concerns. Although a number of permits have been granted to expand existing quarries, there have been no permits to open new crushed stone quarries along the Colorado Front Range since 1978 (Wilburn and Langer, 2000).…”
Section: Resource Protectionmentioning
confidence: 99%