Preliminary Reflection on Basic Problematics of National Public Infrastructure Financing in Indonesia

Soemitro, Ria Asih Aryani; Suprayitno, Hitapriya

doi:10.12962/jifam.v2i1.6908

Cited by 5 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Biaya selalu ada tanpa atau dengan pendapatan apa pun. Infrastruktur tertentu dapat digunakan hanya dengan pembayaran dan infrastruktur lain menghasilkan pendapatan dari kegiatan selain fungsi utamanya (Soemitro & Suprayitno, 2020). Sumber dana untuk pemenuhan kebutuhan infrastruktur rumah susun, dapat berasal dari:…”

Section: Tabel 1 Jenis Rumah Susununclassified

Perbandingan Pengelolaan Rusunawa: Pemilik, Penghuni, Pengelola, Pembiayaan, Luas Unit, Tarif dan Fasilitas

Purnamasari

Soemitro

Suprayitno

2020

Jurnal Manajemen Aset Infrastruktur &Amp; Fasilitas

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Penyelenggaraan infrastruktur rumah susun adalah kegiatan perencanaan, pembangunan, penguasaan dan pemanfaatan, pengelolaan, pemeliharaan dan perawatan, pengendalian, kelembagaan, pendanaan dan sistem pembiayaan, serta peran masyarakat yang dilaksanakan secara sistematis, terpadu, berkelanjutan, dan bertanggung jawab, untuk menjamin terwujudnya rumah susun yang layak huni dan terjangkau dalam lingkungan yang sehat, aman, harmonis, serta menciptakan permukiman yang terpadu guna membangun ketahanan ekonomi, sosial, dan budaya (UU 20/11). Jenis rumah susun seperti pada tabel 1.

show abstract

Section: Tabel 1 Jenis Rumah Susununclassified

Perbandingan Pengelolaan Rusunawa: Pemilik, Penghuni, Pengelola, Pembiayaan, Luas Unit, Tarif dan Fasilitas

Purnamasari

Soemitro

Suprayitno

2020

Jurnal Manajemen Aset Infrastruktur &Amp; Fasilitas

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It must be noted that the Investment Cost and the Development Cost are normally far higher than the Annual Operation, and Annual Maintenance Cost. The Rehabilitation Cost can also be very high, it depends on the seriousness of infrastructure damage (Soemitro & Suprayitno, 2020).…”

Section: Life Cycle Costmentioning

confidence: 99%

Life Cycle Cost Structure of a Government Office Green Building – Case of the Ministry of Public Works and Housing Main Building

Nugroho

Suprayitno

Adi

2020

Journal of Infrastructure &Amp; Facility Asset Management

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

One of the efforts to reduce the large impact of building sectors on the environment is the concept of environmentally friendly building known as green buildings. With the increasing global interest in this concept, green building development in Indonesia was also expected to increase. Cost is one of the most important focus for promoting green buildings, so it is necessary to conduct a cost analysis of a green building to provide a clearer understanding of the life cycle cost structure of a green building in its life cycle as a study to develop the knowledge of Infrastructure Asset Management. In this study data related to the cost component of the government office green building was identified to determine the overall cost of the building from the beginning of its construction until recent year, which can be described as: Initial Cost, Operation and Maintenance Cost, and Energy Cost. The result of this study finds out that during 8 year period of its lifetime the total building expenditure is Rp 483.649.711.849,00 and the life cycle cost structure percentage are: initial cost 43,94%, operation and maintenance cost 39,48%, and energy cost 16,57%. The total energy cost saving is Rp 28.072.536.738,00.

show abstract

“…The existence of these roads can support the discourse of balanced development throughout Indonesia.. The infrastructure must be managed to be able to function sustainably well, economically, efficiently, effectively, and must respect the sustainability (green) principle (Soemitro & Suprayitno, 2019). Infrastructure needs to be well managed.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of Existing Slope Reinforcement Design on Clay Shale Soil and Its Alternative Modifications: A Case Study of the Awunio – Lapuko Road Section Sta 4+955 – 5+015 in the Southeast Sulawesi Province

Azhari,

Khoiri,

Siagian

2024

Journal of Infrastructure &Amp; Facility Asset Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

On the Awunio -Lapuko road section, there was a landslide from STA 4+955 to STA 5+015, causing the roadside to collapse. The probable cause is water infiltration into the soil, affecting the clay shale properties. An analysis of the existing slope stability and its planning needs to be carried out. Water management planning and alternative reinforcement are necessary if the stability does not meet the requirements. Slope stability analysis is conducted on the existing slope and existing design using manual calculation methods and the GEO5 program. The stability considered includes shear stability, tilting, and overall stability.The analysis reveals that the existing slope stability is safe from landslides. However, this contradicts the field observations. Therefore, a crack soil approach is used in this study to assess the landslide conditions in the field, resulting in a safety factor (SF) of 0.95 for the road slope. The existing design, a 2.5 m high retaining wall with bored piles of 50 cm diameter and a depth of 8 m, yields slope stability with an SF of 7.91, indicating safety but being excessively costly. The water management system planning indicates that the drainage channel capacity can handle the water discharge from rainfall. Introducing subdrains improves the slope stability from SF 0.95 to 1.38, but additional reinforcement is still needed. An alternative design with a 2.5 m high retaining wall and bored piles of 40 cm diameter and 3 m depth yields a slope stability 3.29. Replacing the retaining wall structure with natural stone using bored piles of 30 cm diameter and 3 m depth results in an SF of 2.18. If an alternative subdrain with additional gabion reinforcement is implemented, the slope stability becomes 2.23. Additionally, an alternative design using geotextiles results in slope stability with an SF of 1.77. All alternative reinforcements are deemed safe and meet stability requirements

show abstract

Preliminary Reflection on Basic Problematics of National Public Infrastructure Financing in Indonesia

Cited by 5 publications

References 5 publications

Perbandingan Pengelolaan Rusunawa: Pemilik, Penghuni, Pengelola, Pembiayaan, Luas Unit, Tarif dan Fasilitas

Perbandingan Pengelolaan Rusunawa: Pemilik, Penghuni, Pengelola, Pembiayaan, Luas Unit, Tarif dan Fasilitas

Life Cycle Cost Structure of a Government Office Green Building – Case of the Ministry of Public Works and Housing Main Building

Analysis of Existing Slope Reinforcement Design on Clay Shale Soil and Its Alternative Modifications: A Case Study of the Awunio – Lapuko Road Section Sta 4+955 – 5+015 in the Southeast Sulawesi Province

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About