2021
DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofab002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminary, Real-world, Multicenter Experience With Omadacycline for Mycobacterium abscessus Infections

Abstract: Twelve patients were treated with Omadacycline(OMC) as part of a multi-drug regimen for Mycobacterium abscessus. The majority of infections were of pulmonary origin(7/12;58.3%). The median(IQR) duration of OMC was 6.2(5.0-9.5) months. Clinical success occurred in 9/12(75.0%) of patients. Three patients experienced a possible adverse effect while on therapy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the past few years, in vitro studies of omadacycline have reported low MICs against M. abscessus and therefore offer promising potential against this bacterium ( 21 23 , 25 ). Additionally, recent real-world case reports and case series have reported promising clinical outcomes with regimens containing omadacycline in treating M. abscessus lung disease ( 27 , 59 61 ). These observations have warranted evaluation in a preclinical model that permits efficacy determination of omadacycline alone against multiple M. abscessus isolates in a controlled laboratory setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the past few years, in vitro studies of omadacycline have reported low MICs against M. abscessus and therefore offer promising potential against this bacterium ( 21 23 , 25 ). Additionally, recent real-world case reports and case series have reported promising clinical outcomes with regimens containing omadacycline in treating M. abscessus lung disease ( 27 , 59 61 ). These observations have warranted evaluation in a preclinical model that permits efficacy determination of omadacycline alone against multiple M. abscessus isolates in a controlled laboratory setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some advantages of omadacycline compared to tigecycline include (i) that omadacycline is available in both intravenous and oral formulations, making administration simpler for patients and allowing for oral therapy, (ii) that omadacycline has an elevated and sustained concentration in epithelial lining fluid, alveolar cells, and plasma, as well as improved pulmonary pharmacokinetics (PK) compared to those of tigecycline ( 26 ), and (iii) that omadacycline may have better tolerability than tigecycline ( 25 ). In addition, in a recent preliminary, real-world multicenter study, clinical success has been demonstrated with regimens containing omadacycline to treat M. abscessus infections in the majority of patients ( 27 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another case series in which seven out of 12 patients had MAB-PD, omadacycline therapy was associated with treatment success in five out of seven MAB-PD patients, while treatment failure in MAB-PD occurred in one patient with fibrocavitary disease and patient with nodular-bronchiectatic disease with dissemination [94]. Gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic adverse effects were reported in one patient each [94]. A phase II clinical trial evaluating the use of omadacycline in treating MAB-PD is currently in progress [95].…”
Section: Oral Agentsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In a case series of four patients who were treated for MAB disease at different sites, omadacycline was tolerated for >7 months in a patient with MAB-PD, although they required a lobectomy 5 months into omadacycline treatment [93]. In another case series in which seven out of 12 patients had MAB-PD, omadacycline therapy was associated with treatment success in five out of seven MAB-PD patients, while treatment failure in MAB-PD occurred in one patient with fibrocavitary disease and patient with nodular-bronchiectatic disease with dissemination [94]. Gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic adverse effects were reported in one patient each [94].…”
Section: Oral Agentsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation