Preliminary QCSEE Program Test Results

Ciepluch, C. C.

doi:10.4271/771008

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Assessment Work1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2013

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In 2011, Ciepluch [30] discussed that not everyone contributes data of the same quality, due to lack of practice and knowledge which can be improved by practice and experience in map making. Ludwig [22] described a methodology to compare OSM street data with Navteq for all populated roads in Germany.…”

Section: Assessment Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of OpenStreetMap Data - A Review

Sehra¹,

Singh²,

Singh³

2013

IJCA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The meaning and purposes of web has been changing and evolving day by day. Web 2.0 encouraged more contribution by the end users. This movement provided revolutionary methods of sharing and computing data by crowdsourcing such as OpenStreetmap, also called "the wikification of maps" by some researchers. When crowdsourcing collects huge data with help of general public with varying level of mapping experience, the focus of researcher should be on analysing the data rather than collecting it. Researchers have assessed the quality of OpenStreetMap data by comparing it with proprietary data or data of governmental map agencies. This study reviews the research work for assessment of OpenStreetMap Data and also discusses about the future directions. General Terms:Assessment, OpenStreetMap

show abstract

Section: Assessment Workmentioning

confidence: 99%