2001
DOI: 10.1006/mpev.2000.0875
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminary Phylogeny of Encarsia Förster (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) Based on Morphology and 28S rDNA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
74
1
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
7
74
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Within Encarsia, morphologically similar but genetically distinct and geographically isolated populations of Enc. smithi (Babcock et al 2001) would suggest that they are different species. On the other hand, some species exhibit considerable behavioral divergence that is not demonstrated by a corresponding genetic divergence.…”
Section: Taxonomymentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Within Encarsia, morphologically similar but genetically distinct and geographically isolated populations of Enc. smithi (Babcock et al 2001) would suggest that they are different species. On the other hand, some species exhibit considerable behavioral divergence that is not demonstrated by a corresponding genetic divergence.…”
Section: Taxonomymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Twelve species groups were first suggested by Viggiani and Mazzone (1979), and 32 species group names have been proposed by various authors. Seventeen species groups were recognized by Hayat (1998), who chose not to recognize four groups (elegans, inquirenda, luteola and perflava), which have been recognized by subsequent authors (Huang and Polaszek 1998;Polaszek et al 1999;Babcock et al 2001), and other groups were either proposed but not addressed (scapeata, singularis, tremblayi) or proposed after Hayat's review ( citrella, cubensis, divergens). Over the last 20 years there has been an effort to accurately define and place species into these groups (Evans et al 1995;Hayat 1998;Huang and Polaszek 1998;Evans and Polaszek 1998;Heraty and Polaszek 2000;Babcock et al 2001;Manzari et al 2002;Pedata and Polaszek 2003;Polaszek et al 2004), but there is a need for a more comprehensive review of groups beyond that of Hayat (1998).…”
Section: Species Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Th e following forward (F) and reverse (R) primer combinations were used: 28S-D2, (F) 5'-CGT GTT GCT TGA TAG TGC AGC-3' or (F) 5'-CGG GTT GCT TGA GAG TGC AGC-3' and (R) 5'-TCA AGA CGG GTC CTG AAA GT-3' (base numbers 3551-4057 of Drosophila melanogaster, Hancock et al 1988); 28S-D3, Ouvrard et al 2000). PCR protocols follow Babcock et al (2001). PCR products were purifi ed using GeneClean® PCR Purifi cation Kits (Q-BIOgene).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De acordo com Polaszek et al (1992), no entanto, ambas são espécies distintas e podem ser separadas por características dos segmentos do fl agelo da antena. Essa afi rmação é corroborada por Babcock et al (2001) através de evidências moleculares. Polaszek et al (2004) (Oliveira et al 2003).…”
unclassified