2013
DOI: 10.1117/12.2025650
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminary on-orbit performance of the Thermal Infrared Sensor (TIRS) on board Landsat 8

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the standard deviations about the mean bias are significantly higher for Landsat 8, particularly in band 11, even though the instrument signal to noise ratios (SNRs) for Landsat 8 are higher than those for earlier instruments. Since the methodology is identical and the SNR for Landsat 8 is higher, this large variation is likely due to actual changes in the calibration; the correlation of error with scene radiance [19] suggests there is a variable source of calibration error that is not fully accounted for by the combined use of on board [20] and vicarious calibration described here. This residual error has been attributed to a ghosting or stray light problem associated with radiation from outside the detectors nominal point spread function (PSF) impinging on the detector (see Section 6).…”
Section: Landsat 8 Results Using Operational Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the standard deviations about the mean bias are significantly higher for Landsat 8, particularly in band 11, even though the instrument signal to noise ratios (SNRs) for Landsat 8 are higher than those for earlier instruments. Since the methodology is identical and the SNR for Landsat 8 is higher, this large variation is likely due to actual changes in the calibration; the correlation of error with scene radiance [19] suggests there is a variable source of calibration error that is not fully accounted for by the combined use of on board [20] and vicarious calibration described here. This residual error has been attributed to a ghosting or stray light problem associated with radiation from outside the detectors nominal point spread function (PSF) impinging on the detector (see Section 6).…”
Section: Landsat 8 Results Using Operational Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach is very similar to that developed for the Thermal Infrared Sensor (TIRS) on the Landsat 8 platform which uses an identical ROIC as in SOLARIS. 6 The linearity correction developed for SOLARIS has been shown to be more accurate than that for TIRS, but is still too large for the CLARREO mission. Evaluations are currently underway to determine whether an alternate correction approach can reduce the errors or whether a different electronics design is needed for CLARREO.…”
Section: Sensor Linearitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the magnitude of errors for band 11 are more alarming and we would not be confident in producing a land surface temperature product using this radiance data. However, current studies show that there are actual changes in the Landsat 8 calibration, more prevalent in band 11; it is believed that there is still currently a variable source of calibration error, correlated to scene radiance, that can be attributed to stray light from outside the detectors nominal point spread function impinging on the detector , (Montanaro et al, 2013). Therefore, these results, rather than acting as a reflection of the performance of our current methodology, will be utilized in the continuing calibration work and attempts to solve the stray light problem, and a more in depth analysis of the ability to process Landsat 8 using the current methodology will be revisited after there is more confidence in the calibration and characterization of the Landsat 8 thermal bands.…”
Section: Landsat 8 Mean [K] Sd [K]mentioning
confidence: 99%