1990
DOI: 10.1017/s0025315400034305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminary observations on factors affecting foraging activity in the limpet Patella vulgata

Abstract: Activity patterns of limpets were studied at two adjacent sites in an Irish sea lough, Lough Hyne, in order to relate timing of activity to physical and biological influences. Activity was suppressed during heavy rainfall, and osmotic stress from dilution appears to have led to increased mortality in transplanted limpets. Activity increased as tides progressed from neaps to springs, and for limpets low on the shore it was enhanced by wave action. It is suggested that lack of activity in calm water may reduce p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These indirect studies have led to the conclusion that P. vulgata is a keystone species in the intertidal, preventing macroalgal growth through microphagous grazing of epilithic biofilm and associated macroalgal propagules (spores and germlings) (Hill & Hawkins 1991, Jenkins & Hartnoll 2001, Jenkins et al 2005, Coleman et al 2006, Jonsson et al 2006, Moore et al 2007). This view is supported by observational studies of limpet foraging behaviour (Hartnoll & Wright 1977, Little et al 1988, Della Santina et al 1994) and several studies which directly examined limpet gut contents (Hawkins et al 1989, Little et al 1990, Hill & Hawkins 1991.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…These indirect studies have led to the conclusion that P. vulgata is a keystone species in the intertidal, preventing macroalgal growth through microphagous grazing of epilithic biofilm and associated macroalgal propagules (spores and germlings) (Hill & Hawkins 1991, Jenkins & Hartnoll 2001, Jenkins et al 2005, Coleman et al 2006, Jonsson et al 2006, Moore et al 2007). This view is supported by observational studies of limpet foraging behaviour (Hartnoll & Wright 1977, Little et al 1988, Della Santina et al 1994) and several studies which directly examined limpet gut contents (Hawkins et al 1989, Little et al 1990, Hill & Hawkins 1991.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Error bars = ±1 SE temporal scales than is possible with more conventional techniques of direct observation (e.g. Hartnoll & Wright 1977, Little et al 1990 or those techniques requiring sophisticated recording equipment (e.g. Della Santina et al 1994).…”
Section: Grazing Intensitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Animals were scored as active if the Tipp-Ex TM number on the home scar and the shell did not align. The survey was initially conducted on 5 September 1992 (at mean neap tides) and repeated on 11 September (neap^spring tides) and on 15 September (mean spring tides), at which times some of the readings (for sites at East Island and Boundary Bay) were taken from automatic recording devices (as used by Little et al, 1991;N23).…”
Section: Activity Patterns During Submergence On Near-horizontal and mentioning
confidence: 99%