1984
DOI: 10.3133/ofr84297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminary isoseismal map and intensity distribution for the Borah Peak, Idaho, earthquake of October 28, 1983

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1985
1985
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One method of checking for such an underestimate is to consider the distribution of the isoseismals. The isoseismals determined by Stover [ , 1984 for the Coalinga and Borah Peak earthquakes are plotted in Figure 11. The isoseismals which bound the area of intensity V for the Coalinga earthquake are approximately symmetric around the epicenter.…”
Section: Source Directivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One method of checking for such an underestimate is to consider the distribution of the isoseismals. The isoseismals determined by Stover [ , 1984 for the Coalinga and Borah Peak earthquakes are plotted in Figure 11. The isoseismals which bound the area of intensity V for the Coalinga earthquake are approximately symmetric around the epicenter.…”
Section: Source Directivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Borah Peak earthquake was felt over 670,000 km2, reached MMI = VII at the nearby towns of Mackay and Challis (25 km and 65 km distant, respectively, from the main-shock epicenter), caused two deaths in Challis, and resulted in about $12.5 million of damage (Stover, 1985). The earthquake produced 36 km of surface faulting along the southwestern base of the Lost River Range, re-rupturing parts of the 140-km-long Lost River fault that had last broken about mid-Holoccne time and a branch fault; vertical displacement along the new fault scarps reached a maximum of 2.7 m (0.8 m average), and net slip averaged 0.17 m of sinistral slip for every 1.00 m of dip slip (Crone and Machette, 1984;Crone and others, 1987).…”
Section: Largest Historical Earthquakesmentioning
confidence: 99%