1989
DOI: 10.1016/0093-691x(89)90083-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminary implications of B-mode ultrasonography of the testicles of beef bulls with normal breeding soundness examinations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
10
0
2

Year Published

1990
1990
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
5
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Ultrasonography was not a practical way to measure testis size, as testis size was measured more easily, simply and inexpensively with calipers or a scrotal tape than by ultrasonography. This finding is consistent with other studies [14,15].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ultrasonography was not a practical way to measure testis size, as testis size was measured more easily, simply and inexpensively with calipers or a scrotal tape than by ultrasonography. This finding is consistent with other studies [14,15].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…There was no significant differences among bulls in ultrasound measurements and there was no relationship to semen quality (Table 1). Cartree et al found no difference among bulls judged to be normal based upon a breeding soundness examination [14]. Likewise, in a more extensive study of beef bulls 13 to 31 or more months old , Eilts and Pechman [16] found no remarkable differences obtained by ultrasonography that were not evident from a concurrent breeding soundness examination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The mediastinum testis was represented as a hyperechoic line in longitudinal images. These observations are similar to those described for boar [28], dog [29], bull [30], rams and male goats [17] and camels [31]. Ahmad et al [32] recorded an increase in the echogenicity of testicular parenchyma with advancement in age of the bull; the mean number of pixels of testicular ultrasonograms increased significantly up to 24 mo of age and then leveled off as the age increased.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The head and tail of the epididymis were easily identified on all testes, but the epididymal body and ductus (vas) deferens were difficult to identify. Ultrasonic measurement of testicles was correlated with testicular circumference, weight and volume but not with scrotal circumference [133]. Ultrasonic scanning of the bovine testicle was found to have no detrimental effect on reproductive capacity (semen characteristics, testicular dimensions and consistency) after exposure to a 3-min scan with a 5.0 MHz transducer [134].…”
Section: Ultrasonography Of the Male Reproductive Systemmentioning
confidence: 95%