2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-1781(02)00111-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminary evidence of reduced cognitive inhibition in methamphetamine-dependent individuals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

12
126
3
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
12
126
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These results suggest that methamphetamine-addicted individuals, like healthy human volunteers (Johnson et al, 2000), experience measurable increases in cognitive performance with experimentally administered intravenous methamphetamine. This is the case despite the expectation of deteriorated cognitive functioning (Salo et al, 2002) due to presumed fronto-striatal damage (Ernst et al, 2000;Volkow et al, 2001). Replication of these results would not only establish this human laboratory paradigm for testing cognitive performance and attention among methamphetamine-dependent individuals but also provide added support for the notion that addicted individuals might continue taking the drug to maintain or enhance cognitive performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…These results suggest that methamphetamine-addicted individuals, like healthy human volunteers (Johnson et al, 2000), experience measurable increases in cognitive performance with experimentally administered intravenous methamphetamine. This is the case despite the expectation of deteriorated cognitive functioning (Salo et al, 2002) due to presumed fronto-striatal damage (Ernst et al, 2000;Volkow et al, 2001). Replication of these results would not only establish this human laboratory paradigm for testing cognitive performance and attention among methamphetamine-dependent individuals but also provide added support for the notion that addicted individuals might continue taking the drug to maintain or enhance cognitive performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Clinically, mAMPH users have impairments in motor skills (Volkow et al, 2001;Wang et al, 2004), maintaining attention (Nordahl et al, 2003;Salo et al, 2002), decision-making skills (Rogers et al, 1999;Paulus et al, 2002), and set-shifting abilities Ornstein et al, 2000). One particularly prominent feature noted in several studies with human mAMPH users is that of these users' poor recall and recognition memory (Ornstein et al, 2000;Volkow et al, 2001;Simon et al, 2002;Gonzalez et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 10 regions of interest (ROIs) were selected because of prior demonstrations of functional abnormalities associated with MA abuse: parietal cortex (Brodmann areas (BAs) 1,2,3,5,7,19,39,40), thalamus, dorsal striatum, ventral striatum, medial orbitofrontal cortex (gyrus rectus and medial orbital gyrus; BA 11), lateral orbitofrontal cortex (lateral, posterior orbital and inferior frontal gyri; BAs 47, 11), infragenual ACC (BAs 25, 32), supragenual ACC (BAs 24, 32, 33), insula (BA 13) and amygdala. 1,6,8,9 ROIs were drawn on the structural MR template provided in SPM2, using MEDx Software (Sensor Systems, Sterling, VA, USA).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5] These deficits appear to reflect regional cerebral dysfunction. When abstinent for 1 week, MA abusers studied with [F-18]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and positron emission tomography (PET) have more severe self-reports of depressive symptoms than control subjects, and these self-reports covary with relative uptake of the radiotracer in anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and amygdala.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%