1988
|
Sign up to set email alerts
Preliminary Evaluation of the Use of Mussel Adhesive Protein in Experimental Epikeratoplasty
Search citation statements
Order By: Relevance
Paper Sections
Select...
18
2
0
0
Citation Types
0
5
1
0
Year Published
Range
1989
19892021
2021Publication Types
Select...
16
2
2
Relationship
0
20
Authors
Journals
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
References 21 publications
0
5
1
0
Order By: Relevance
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Native barnacle cement was shown to be effective in tests of rabbit bone repair [10]. Adhesive proteins extracted from mussels appeared to be nontoxic and well tolerated by biological systems when used in transplantation experiments in vivo (e.g., corneal transplantation in rabbit; [11]). However, in both cases, the difficulty to collect sufficient quantities of adhesive material prevented further use of this material in concrete medical procedures.…”
Section: Introduction
contrasting
confidence: 40%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Native barnacle cement was shown to be effective in tests of rabbit bone repair [10]. Adhesive proteins extracted from mussels appeared to be nontoxic and well tolerated by biological systems when used in transplantation experiments in vivo (e.g., corneal transplantation in rabbit; [11]). However, in both cases, the difficulty to collect sufficient quantities of adhesive material prevented further use of this material in concrete medical procedures.…”
Section: Introduction
contrasting
confidence: 40%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Dr. Robin L. Garrell (Organic Chemistry Department, University of California, Los Angeles [UCLA]) has worked on elucidating the chemical mechanisms for adhesion and cohesion in Mefp-1 and other marine biopolymers to develop artificial tissues and bioreactors (Ooka and Garrell 2000 ; http://www.chem.ucla.edu/dept/Organic/garrell.html ). Future dental and medical adhesives may contain mussel adhesive proteins and/or domains from mussel adhesives (Tay and Pashley 2002 ; Ninan et al 2003 ; Fulkerson et al 1990 ; Robin et al 1988 ; Schmidt et al 1994 ).…”
Section: Current and Future Research Areas Related To Mussel Adhesion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Over a seven-day period, only microdrops of the cement were produced.” This is sufficient explanation for why native barnacle cement is not used in dentistry to this day. In a similar vein, native mussel foot proteins (mfps) were tested in rabbit cornea transplants (Robin et al 1988) and for soft tissue repair (Papatheofanis and Ray 1982; Ninan et al 2007). Like barnacle cement, native mfps are not used in eye surgery or any other medical procedure, though native mfps isolated from cultured mussels are still commercially available in mg quantities and are priced like life-saving medicine (Cell-Tak, BDBiosciences).…”
Section: Production Prospects
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Native barnacle cement was shown to be effective in tests of rabbit bone repair [10]. Adhesive proteins extracted from mussels appeared to be nontoxic and well tolerated by biological systems when used in transplantation experiments in vivo (e.g., corneal transplantation in rabbit; [11]). However, in both cases, the difficulty to collect sufficient quantities of adhesive material prevented further use of this material in concrete medical procedures.…”
Section: Introduction
contrasting
confidence: 40%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Dr. Robin L. Garrell (Organic Chemistry Department, University of California, Los Angeles [UCLA]) has worked on elucidating the chemical mechanisms for adhesion and cohesion in Mefp-1 and other marine biopolymers to develop artificial tissues and bioreactors (Ooka and Garrell 2000 ; http://www.chem.ucla.edu/dept/Organic/garrell.html ). Future dental and medical adhesives may contain mussel adhesive proteins and/or domains from mussel adhesives (Tay and Pashley 2002 ; Ninan et al 2003 ; Fulkerson et al 1990 ; Robin et al 1988 ; Schmidt et al 1994 ).…”
Section: Current and Future Research Areas Related To Mussel Adhesion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Over a seven-day period, only microdrops of the cement were produced.” This is sufficient explanation for why native barnacle cement is not used in dentistry to this day. In a similar vein, native mussel foot proteins (mfps) were tested in rabbit cornea transplants (Robin et al 1988) and for soft tissue repair (Papatheofanis and Ray 1982; Ninan et al 2007). Like barnacle cement, native mfps are not used in eye surgery or any other medical procedure, though native mfps isolated from cultured mussels are still commercially available in mg quantities and are priced like life-saving medicine (Cell-Tak, BDBiosciences).…”
Section: Production Prospects
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Native barnacle cement was shown to be effective in tests of rabbit bone repair [10]. Adhesive proteins extracted from mussels appeared to be nontoxic and well tolerated by biological systems when used in transplantation experiments in vivo (e.g., corneal transplantation in rabbit; [11]). However, in both cases, the difficulty to collect sufficient quantities of adhesive material prevented further use of this material in concrete medical procedures.…”
Section: Introduction
contrasting
confidence: 40%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Dr. Robin L. Garrell (Organic Chemistry Department, University of California, Los Angeles [UCLA]) has worked on elucidating the chemical mechanisms for adhesion and cohesion in Mefp-1 and other marine biopolymers to develop artificial tissues and bioreactors (Ooka and Garrell 2000 ; http://www.chem.ucla.edu/dept/Organic/garrell.html ). Future dental and medical adhesives may contain mussel adhesive proteins and/or domains from mussel adhesives (Tay and Pashley 2002 ; Ninan et al 2003 ; Fulkerson et al 1990 ; Robin et al 1988 ; Schmidt et al 1994 ).…”
Section: Current and Future Research Areas Related To Mussel Adhesion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Over a seven-day period, only microdrops of the cement were produced.” This is sufficient explanation for why native barnacle cement is not used in dentistry to this day. In a similar vein, native mussel foot proteins (mfps) were tested in rabbit cornea transplants (Robin et al 1988) and for soft tissue repair (Papatheofanis and Ray 1982; Ninan et al 2007). Like barnacle cement, native mfps are not used in eye surgery or any other medical procedure, though native mfps isolated from cultured mussels are still commercially available in mg quantities and are priced like life-saving medicine (Cell-Tak, BDBiosciences).…”
Section: Production Prospects
mentioning
confidence: 99%