1989
DOI: 10.1093/bja/62.2.144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminary Evaluation of the Enclosed Magill Breathing System

Abstract: The Enclosed Magill anaesthetic breathing system may be used for both spontaneous ventilation and controlled ventilation with similar fresh gas flows. During spontaneous ventilation, a fresh gas flow between estimated alveolar ventilation and minute ventilation is adequate and the system performs as a Mapleson A type breathing system. For controlled ventilation, a fresh gas flow of 70-100 ml kg-1 min-1 produces normocapnia in most subjects, as demonstrated in this limited study. These values are similar to tho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1991
1991
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From figure 3, the mean VF required to maintain this value of PE' CO , was 66 ml kg" 1 min" 1 , while a VF of 70 ml kg" 1 min" 1 produced mild hypocapnia. Allowing for differences in methodology, these results are in agreement with those of Keeri-Szanto [1], Miller and Miller [4] and Chriswell and colleagues [15], but not with those of Bruce and Soni [16] whose prototype EAR required a mean VF of 100 ml kg" 1 min" 1 to maintain a mean PE'CO, of 5.0 kPa. The latter suggest that the inefficiency of their system was caused by the expiratory valve opening prematurely, allowing fresh gas to displace deadspace gas stored in the inspiratory tube.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…From figure 3, the mean VF required to maintain this value of PE' CO , was 66 ml kg" 1 min" 1 , while a VF of 70 ml kg" 1 min" 1 produced mild hypocapnia. Allowing for differences in methodology, these results are in agreement with those of Keeri-Szanto [1], Miller and Miller [4] and Chriswell and colleagues [15], but not with those of Bruce and Soni [16] whose prototype EAR required a mean VF of 100 ml kg" 1 min" 1 to maintain a mean PE'CO, of 5.0 kPa. The latter suggest that the inefficiency of their system was caused by the expiratory valve opening prematurely, allowing fresh gas to displace deadspace gas stored in the inspiratory tube.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…1). A defective valve in the EAR system tested by Bruce and Soni [9] may have resulted in their finding somewhat smaller (although significant) differences in end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressures between patients during ventilation of the lungs with the EAR and the Bain system [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%