2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminary evaluation of probiotic properties and safety profile of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum isolated from spontaneously fermented milk, Amabere amaruranu

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(63 reference statements)
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, following 4 h of incubation in acidic conditions (pH 2 and 3), although the cell count in the pH 2 group was significantly lower than those in the control group and the pH 3 group (p < 0.05), no significant difference was observed between the control group and the pH 3 group (p > 0.05). Given that the digestive tract averages pH 3, these results affirm the robustness of strain cqf-43 in the acidic digestive environment [26]. Under bile salt conditions, although the cell count of strain cqf-43 was significantly lower than that of the control group (p < 0.05), it did not completely inactivate, maintaining a substantial population of viable cells (Figure 3B).…”
Section: Virulence Factorssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…However, following 4 h of incubation in acidic conditions (pH 2 and 3), although the cell count in the pH 2 group was significantly lower than those in the control group and the pH 3 group (p < 0.05), no significant difference was observed between the control group and the pH 3 group (p > 0.05). Given that the digestive tract averages pH 3, these results affirm the robustness of strain cqf-43 in the acidic digestive environment [26]. Under bile salt conditions, although the cell count of strain cqf-43 was significantly lower than that of the control group (p < 0.05), it did not completely inactivate, maintaining a substantial population of viable cells (Figure 3B).…”
Section: Virulence Factorssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Antimicrobial activity is one of the most important criteria for selecting probiotic bacteria. Previous studies approved the bio preservative applications of LAB due to the antimicrobial activities against common foodborne bacteria (Chaillou et al 2014 ; dos Santos Leandro et al 2021 ; Katiku et al 2022 ; Prabhurajeshwar et al 2017 ). In the present study, L. plantarum BG24 showed antimicrobial properties against four different pathogens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Susceptibility pattern was assessed using 19 different antibiotics which are Amikacin (30 µg/disc, Oxoid, England), Amoxicillin (25 µg/disc, Oxoid, England), Ampicillin (10 µg/disc, Oxoid, England), Cefamandole (30 µg/disc, Oxoid, England), Chloramphenicol (30 µg/disc, Oxoid, England), Ciprofloxacin (5 µg/disc, Oxoid, England), Doxycycline (30 µg/disc, Oxoid, England), Erythromycin (15 µg/disc, Oxoid, England), Gentamicin (10 µg/disc, Oxoid, England), Kanamycin (30 µg/disc, Oxoid, England), Lincomycin (15 µg/disc, Oxoid, England), Nalidixic acid (30 µg/disc, Oxoid, England), Penicillin (10 E/disc, Oxoid, England), Piperacillin (100 µg/disc, Oxoid, England), Oxacillin (1 µg/disc, Oxoid, England), Rifampin (5 µg/disc, Oxoid, England), Tetracycline (30 µg/disc, Oxoid, England), Tobramycin (10 µg/disc, Oxoid, England) and Vancomycin (30 µg/disc, Oxoid, England). The zone of inhibition diameters (ZOI) was measured and interpreted (Katiku et al 2022 ) as ZOI ≥ 21 mm (Sensitive, S); ZOI: 16–20 mm (Intermediately susceptible, I); ZOI ≤ 15 mm (Resistant, R).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plates were then incubated at 37°C for 24 h. The diameters of the inhibition zones around each disk (ZDI values) were measured and interpreted according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) 2009 guidelines. The results were categorized as follows: resistant (ZDI: ≤ 15 mm), sensitive (ZDI: ≥ 21 mm), or intermediately susceptible (ZDI: 16–20 mm) ( Katiku et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%