2015
DOI: 10.1080/10402381.2015.1025153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminary evaluation of anin vivofluorometer to quantify algal periphyton biomass and community composition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S1f). In total, only 0.7% of periphyton biomass measurements in our experiments were above 4 lg cm 22 , the reported upper threshold for unbiased and accurate BT performance (Harris and Graham 2015;Echenique-Subiabre et al 2016). Because of the strong correlations observed and the low number of measurements potentially affected by the instrument accuracy, we concluded that the BT provided accurate estimates of autotroph biomass and present only BT-based data hereafter.…”
Section: Comparison Of Bt-and Hplc-based Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…S1f). In total, only 0.7% of periphyton biomass measurements in our experiments were above 4 lg cm 22 , the reported upper threshold for unbiased and accurate BT performance (Harris and Graham 2015;Echenique-Subiabre et al 2016). Because of the strong correlations observed and the low number of measurements potentially affected by the instrument accuracy, we concluded that the BT provided accurate estimates of autotroph biomass and present only BT-based data hereafter.…”
Section: Comparison Of Bt-and Hplc-based Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…We measured periphyton biomass in the field using an in situ deployable fluorometer (BenthoTorch, bbe Moldaenke GmbH, Schwentinental, Germany). This instrument is designed for rapid quantification of biomass of benthic autotrophs based on in vivo chlorophyll a fluorescence at 690 nm, and for assessment of community composition by discrimination of diatoms, green algae, and cyanobacteria based on the fluorescence of marker pigments with fluorescent signatures at 470 nm, 525 nm, and 610 nm (bbe Moldaenke ; Harris and Graham ). Studies that examined the accuracy and sensitivity of the BenthoTorch (BT) suggested it as a useful tool for examining patterns over sites and time (Harris and Graham ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In a study of 24 subarctic oligotrophic Swedish streams, Kahlert and McKie (2014) demonstrated that biomass did not significantly differ between conventional laboratory methods and measures from a BenthoTorch. Harris and Graham (2015) also showed that the BenthoTorch compared reasonably well with laboratory measurements for relative measures of chlorophyll-a, but differences in absolute concentrations and periphyton biomass existed due to thick filamentous algal systems. However, the BenthoTorch does not account for variability in cell size and the presence of non-chlorophyll biomass in estimating the proportion of different algal groups, and is, therefore, unable to distinguish redfluorescing algal chlorophyll from that of other algal groups (Kahlert and McKie 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%