2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2023.109788
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminary development of machine learning-based error correction model for low-fidelity reactor physics simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The subscripts H and L indicate high-fidelity and low-fidelity data, respectively. According to the equation, the predicted high-fidelity data can be determined by adding the error predictions from the machine learning model to the low-fidelity solutions 22 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subscripts H and L indicate high-fidelity and low-fidelity data, respectively. According to the equation, the predicted high-fidelity data can be determined by adding the error predictions from the machine learning model to the low-fidelity solutions 22 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subscripts H and L indicate high-fidelity and low-fidelity data, respectively. According to the equation, the predicted high-fidelity data can be determined by adding the error predictions from the machine learning model to the low-fidelity solutions 18 .…”
Section: Data Availabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, low-fidelity methods, such as the nodal expansion method (SARAX and CASMO), generally introduce coarser meshes, group collapse and more approximation during modeling and simulating, which might exhibit significant error, especially at the reactor boundary [20]. Furthermore, some advanced reactor designs cannot be sufficiently modeled using the existing nodal codes [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%