Abstract:The Child Report of Posttraumatic Symptoms (CROPS) is an effective 26-item trauma assessment tool. Research has indicated a 14-item version of the CROPS for juvenile offenders with improved predictive accuracy for detecting trauma exposure among male offenders and commensurate accuracy for female offenders. However, the 14-item scale has yet to be validated for juvenile offenders with an established trauma measure. Cross-sectional retrospective data of 74 adjudicated youth (59.5% male) from the original CROPS … Show more
“…Conflicting results were rated for three measures: the Trauma Symptom Checklist for Children (TSCC), the Child Report of Posttraumatic Symptoms (CROPS), and the MMPI-A. The CROPS had different methodological ratings across studies, with some reporting an EFA along with acceptable Cronbach values in two studies by Edner et al (2017) and Edner, Glaser et al (2020) , Edner, Piegore et al (2020) , and a combination of good alpha values, but a lack of factor analysis in another study ( Flaherty, 2017 ). Similarly, the MMPI-A was reported by Cashel et al (2000) to have a good Cronbach alpha for the PK subscale, but no available factor analysis and Murray et al (2013) also reported no factor analysis.…”
Despite the available evidence identifying the high prevalence rates of potentially traumatic experiences in forensic populations, there is still a lack of evidence supporting the use of suitable assessment tools, especially for young males in custody. For services to identify, support, and offer trauma interventions to this cohort, practitioners require reliable and valid assessment tools. This systematic review (Open Science Framework registration: https://osf.io/r6hbk ) identifies those tools able to provide valid, reliable, and comparable data for this cohort. Five electronic databases and gray literature were searched to identify relevant measures. Inclusion criteria: studies of tools to assess for trauma with males aged between 12 and 25 years-old in a custodial setting, any year of publication, and available in English. Exclusion criteria: studies that did not measure psychological trauma or include a standalone trauma scale, or report primary data. A three-step quality assessment method was used to evaluate the methodological quality and psychometric properties of the measures. Fourteen studies were selected for review (which included 12 measures). The studies sampled a total of approximately 1,768 male participants and an age range of 12 to 25 years. The studies reported on various types of psychometric evidence and due to the lack of homogeneity, a narrative synthesis was used to discuss, interpret, and evaluate each measure. The overall quality of the psychometric properties of the measures in this review showed that the currently available instruments for the assessment of trauma with young males in custody is limited but promising.
“…Conflicting results were rated for three measures: the Trauma Symptom Checklist for Children (TSCC), the Child Report of Posttraumatic Symptoms (CROPS), and the MMPI-A. The CROPS had different methodological ratings across studies, with some reporting an EFA along with acceptable Cronbach values in two studies by Edner et al (2017) and Edner, Glaser et al (2020) , Edner, Piegore et al (2020) , and a combination of good alpha values, but a lack of factor analysis in another study ( Flaherty, 2017 ). Similarly, the MMPI-A was reported by Cashel et al (2000) to have a good Cronbach alpha for the PK subscale, but no available factor analysis and Murray et al (2013) also reported no factor analysis.…”
Despite the available evidence identifying the high prevalence rates of potentially traumatic experiences in forensic populations, there is still a lack of evidence supporting the use of suitable assessment tools, especially for young males in custody. For services to identify, support, and offer trauma interventions to this cohort, practitioners require reliable and valid assessment tools. This systematic review (Open Science Framework registration: https://osf.io/r6hbk ) identifies those tools able to provide valid, reliable, and comparable data for this cohort. Five electronic databases and gray literature were searched to identify relevant measures. Inclusion criteria: studies of tools to assess for trauma with males aged between 12 and 25 years-old in a custodial setting, any year of publication, and available in English. Exclusion criteria: studies that did not measure psychological trauma or include a standalone trauma scale, or report primary data. A three-step quality assessment method was used to evaluate the methodological quality and psychometric properties of the measures. Fourteen studies were selected for review (which included 12 measures). The studies sampled a total of approximately 1,768 male participants and an age range of 12 to 25 years. The studies reported on various types of psychometric evidence and due to the lack of homogeneity, a narrative synthesis was used to discuss, interpret, and evaluate each measure. The overall quality of the psychometric properties of the measures in this review showed that the currently available instruments for the assessment of trauma with young males in custody is limited but promising.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.