2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.vprsr.2021.100551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminary comparative analysis of the resolving power of COX1 and 16S-rDNA as molecular markers for the identification of ticks from Portugal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the presence of similarities and juvenile stages, it is inadequate to achieve the accurate morphological identification of tick species. Therefore, genetic markers such as mitochondrial cox1 gene have been successfully proven as reliable for the molecular confirmation of different ticks ( Filipe et al., 2021 ; Zhao et al, 2020 ). In the current study, we report the Hy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the presence of similarities and juvenile stages, it is inadequate to achieve the accurate morphological identification of tick species. Therefore, genetic markers such as mitochondrial cox1 gene have been successfully proven as reliable for the molecular confirmation of different ticks ( Filipe et al., 2021 ; Zhao et al, 2020 ). In the current study, we report the Hy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cox1 gene appears to be more useful for intraspecific genetic variability studies (Filipe et al, 2021;Paternina et al, 2016). This highlights the difficulty of using these two genes and the need for more genetic characterization using whole-genome sequencing (Burger et al, 2014;Low et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…microplus clade C. Hence, the morphological classification obtained may not always reflect the molecular results (Nava et al, 2009). In this study where we have used both Cox1 and 16S rDNA as well as morphologic identification keys for the taxonomic assignation of ticks, the species was determined by an identical outcome with at least two of the three tools used as shown elsewhere (Filipe et al, 2021; Paternina et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation