Preliminary Clinical Data and the Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Autogenous Bone Grafts Versus Xenograft Implantations in Vertical Bone Deficiencies Before Dental Implant Installation

Wychowański, Piotr; Woliński, Jarosław; Morawiec, Tadeusz; Kownacki, Patryk; Starzyńska, Anna; Kosieradzki, Maciej; Fiedor, Piotr

doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.02.099

Cited by 16 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Regarding the intervention, BRT was used for vertical ridge augmentation in 14 studies, while in 2 studies BRT was used for sinus floor elevation. In two studies, BRT was compared with other regeneration procedures [10,11]. The studies had a mean follow-up period of 17.17 ± 11.65 months.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Bone gain evaluated through cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was registered in four of the studies [10,11,21,24]. The maximum bone height gain reported was 13.07 mm [24] and the minimum was 3.09 mm [10] with an overall mean of 4.94 mm across the four studies.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In order to overcome these drawbacks, the bone ring technique (BRT) has been described as a one-stage approach for vertical ridge augmentation, in which an autogenous or allogeneic cortico-cancellous bone block graft is stabilized with a simultaneously inserted dental implant [9]. Several case reports and case series using BRT have been published but there is not enough evidence for its long-term efficacy [10][11][12].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Results of individual studiesTable 1), while Wychowansky et al[11] registered a higher bone gain for vertical tunnel bone augmentation with xenograft compared with BRT.Six bone ring failures among the total of 219 bone rings placed were recorded, with a mean bone ring survival rate of 97.26%. All the failures registered affected autogenous bone rings.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Effectiveness of the bone ring technique and simultaneous implant placement for vertical ridge augmentation: a systematic review

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Dimensional changes after dental extraction frequently lead to situations in which bone augmentation procedures are required prior to dental implant placement. Bone ring technique (BRT) has been described as a one-stage approach to restore vertical alveolar ridge defects, in which an autogenous or allogeneic cortico-cancellous bone block graft is stabilized with a dental implant inserted simultaneously. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the clinical performance of BRT. Materials and methods This review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. An electronic search was conducted in four databases: (1) The National Library of Medicine (MEDLINE/PubMed) via Ovid; (2) Web of Science (WOS); (3) SCOPUS; and (4) Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale and The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tool were used to assess the quality of evidence in the studies reviewed. Results Sixteen studies with a total of 186 patients treated with 219 bone rings bocks were included in the review. The studies showed a mean bone gain of 4.94 mm, mean bone resorption of 0.83 mm, and mean marginal bone loss of 0.57 mm after a mean follow-up period of 13.35 months. A mean bone ring survival rate of 97.26% and implant survival rate of 94.97% were recorded. Conclusions BRT would appear to be an adequate alternative technique for restoring single vertical alveolar ridge defects with simultaneous dental implant placement. However, further studies comparing this technique with other vertical ridge augmentation procedures in different clinical scenarios are needed to confirm the present results.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Effectiveness of the bone ring technique and simultaneous implant placement for vertical ridge augmentation: a systematic review

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…There are many protocols concerning dental implant placement in regenerated bone or even in the bone defect site. One should mention here that vertical bone augmentation, horizontal bone augmentation, guided bone regeneration, sinus floor lift techniques, distraction osteogenesis, alveolar ridge preservation and many other techniques, which are widely used as treatments to prepare patients for implant placement or even carried out simultaneously with dental implant placement, all require more effective and quick osseointegration, which may be disturbed by many more factors than in conventional dental implant insertion protocols [ 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Methods of Topical Administration of Drugs and Biological Active Substances for Dental Implants—A Narrative Review

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dental implants are, nowadays, established surgical devices for the restoration of lost teeth. Considered as an alternative for traditional prosthetic appliances, dental implants surpass them in reliability and patient feedback. Local drug delivery around the implants promotes osseointegration and reduces peri-implantitis. However, there are currently no methods of a multiple, precise topical administration of drugs to the implant area. Engineering coatings on the implants, drug application on carriers during implantation, or gingival pockets do not meet all requirements of dental surgeons. Therefore, there is a need to create porous implants and other medical devices that will allow a multiple drug delivery at a controlled dose and release profile without traumatic treatment. Due to the growing demand for the use of biologically active agents to support dental implant treatment at its various stages (implant placement, long-term use of dental superstructures, treatment of the peri-implant conditions) and due to the proven effectiveness of the topical application of pharmacological biologically active agents to the implant area, the authors would like to present a review and show the methods and devices that can be used by clinicians for local drug administration to facilitate dental implant treatment. Our review concludes that there is a need for research in the field of inventions such as new medical devices or implants with gradient solid–porous structures. These devices, in the future, will enable to perform repeatable, controllable, atraumatic, and repeatable injections of active factors that may affect the improvement of osteointegration and the longer survival of implants, as well as the treatment of peri-implantitis.

show abstract

An ethical perspective to using bone grafts in dentistry

Gill¹,

Prakash²,

Forghany³

et al. 2022

The Journal of the American Dental Association

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Preliminary Clinical Data and the Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Autogenous Bone Grafts Versus Xenograft Implantations in Vertical Bone Deficiencies Before Dental Implant Installation

Cited by 16 publications

References 6 publications

Effectiveness of the bone ring technique and simultaneous implant placement for vertical ridge augmentation: a systematic review

Effectiveness of the bone ring technique and simultaneous implant placement for vertical ridge augmentation: a systematic review

Methods of Topical Administration of Drugs and Biological Active Substances for Dental Implants—A Narrative Review

An ethical perspective to using bone grafts in dentistry

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About