Preliminary classification criteria for the cryoglobulinaemic vasculitis

Abstract

BackgroundTo develop preliminary classification criteria for the cryoglobulinaemic syndrome or cryoglobulinaemic vasculitis (CV).MethodsStudy part I developed a questionnaire for CV to be included in the formal, second part (study part II). Positivity of serum cryoglobulins was defined by experts as an essential condition for CV classification. In study part II, a core set of classification items (questionnaire, clinical and laboratory items, as agreed) was tested in three groups of patients and controls—that is, group A (new patients with the CV), group B (controls with serum cryoglobulins but lacking CV) and group C (controls without serum cryoglobulins but with features which can be observed in CV).ResultsIn study part I (188 cases, 284 controls), a positive response to at least two of three selected questions showed a sensitivity of 81.9% and a specificity of 83.5% for CV. This questionnaire was employed and validated in study part II, which included 272 patients in group A and 228 controls in group B. The final classification criteria for CV, by pooling data from group A and group B, required the positivity of questionnaire plus clinical, questionnaire plus laboratory, or clinical plus laboratory items, or all the three, providing a sensitivity of 88.5% and a specificity of 93.6% for CV. By comparing data in group A versus group C (425 controls), the same classification criteria showed a sensitivity 88.5% and a specificity 97.0% for CV.ConclusionClassification criteria for CV were developed, and now need validation.

Treatment with rituximab in patients with mixed cryoglobulinemia syndrome: Results of multicenter cohort study and review of the literature

“…The patients recruited have been recently treated with rituximab but never described in previous reports. In all cases the MCs classification satisfied the recently proposed criteria [32]; concomitant autoimmune systemic diseases or malignancies were invariably ruled-out, as well as possible infectious conditions other than HCV. The possible association with hepatotropic virus infection, i.e.…”

Recommendations for the management of mixed cryoglobulinemia syndrome in hepatitis C virus-infected patients

“…However, although it is generally considered to be rare, MCS is actually not uncommon, especially in southern European countries where the prevalence of HCV infection is high among the elderly. Various attempts at defining a clinical classification have been made since the 1990s and the GISC (Italian Group for the Study of Cryoglobulinemia) has recently completed a large international cooperative study aimed at establishing classification criteria on the basis of standard methods [9]. Managing MCS means dealing with multiple and often very different clinical patterns, activity and severity, and should have the aim of preventing irreversible organ damage, reducing pain and improving the patients' quality of life.…”

Cryofibrinogenemia: A Marker of Severity of Cryoglobulinemic Vasculitis

“…Because of the retrospective design of our study, we did not use the recent classification criteria which include a questionnaire [13]. In our study, no patient was HCV-infected.…”