2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2011.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminary analysis of process flow sheet modifications for energy efficient CO2 capture from flue gases using chemical absorption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
84
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
84
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Kent-Eisenberg model gave slightly higher heat consumption. The standard process gives a lower value than in most references [7,9,13,17], and as mentioned earlier, this can be explained by a high number of stages, a low temperature difference and a low removal grade.…”
Section: Energy Comparisons Of the Alternativesmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Kent-Eisenberg model gave slightly higher heat consumption. The standard process gives a lower value than in most references [7,9,13,17], and as mentioned earlier, this can be explained by a high number of stages, a low temperature difference and a low removal grade.…”
Section: Energy Comparisons Of the Alternativesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Recent surveys of process flowsheet modifications for energy efficient CO 2 capture from flue gas using chemical absorption have been published by Cousins et al [5] and also Le Moullec and Kanniche [6]. Rate-based Aspen Plus simulations for such processes have been performed by Cousins et al [7], and Fernandez et al [8] have also performed cost estimation based on Aspen Plus simulations. Simulations with the process simulation programs Unisim and ProTreat followed by economical calculations have been performed by Karimi et al [9].…”
Section: Literature On Alternative Process Configurations For Co 2 Abmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this will lead to the formation of diluted ammonia solution, which requires the subsequent recovery of ammonia and regeneration of water. After examining several alternative options, we chose rich solvent split as the focus of the investigation (Cousins et al, 2011). In this option, a small portion of rich solvent is introduced into the top of stripper, while the rest of the rich solvent is heated and introduced into the middle of the stripper (e.g.…”
Section: Applying the Rich Solvent Split Option To Eliminate Solid Prmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For their base line configuration in which 2.1053 kmol/h of CO 2 captured by 30 mass% MEA, they found that the reboiler heat duty was 187.5 kW. Cousins et al [3] analyzed process flowsheet modification for energy efficient CO 2 capture from flue gases with aqueous solution of MEA. Their simulation results for 85% CO 2 capture from flue gas with a CO 2 purity stream of about 98% revealed that up to 19% energy can be saved by using vapor compression of lean solvent flashing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%