2021
DOI: 10.1080/14763141.2021.1927163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prelanding movement strategies among chronic ankle instability, coper, and control subjects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is interesting to note that copers displayed increased Gmed activity compared to controls. Our results may partially support previous research, which reported greater Gmed activation in copers than in uninjured controls during functional movement 25 26 . In addition, copers had the largest Gmed thickness during band-walking exercises 27 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It is interesting to note that copers displayed increased Gmed activity compared to controls. Our results may partially support previous research, which reported greater Gmed activation in copers than in uninjured controls during functional movement 25 26 . In addition, copers had the largest Gmed thickness during band-walking exercises 27 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…38 Increased knee valgus angle is one of the high-risk factors for ACL injury and a significant biomechanical characteristic change caused by landing phase compensation strategy in patients with CAI. 39,40 The present study demonstrated a significant reduction in peak knee valgus angle at the early landing phase in the KT group. Sigward et al 41 found a significant negative correlation between ankle dorsiflexion range of motion and knee frontal plane excursion in female soccer players during a drop land task.…”
Section: Lsjsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…The cut‐off frequency of 10 Hz was determined by residual analyses 5 for all landing trials. A static calibration trial in the anatomical position was recorded to define neutral (zero) joint angles using previously described methods, 19 and this calibration file was applied to all landing and jumping trials. Local coordinate systems for the ankle, knee, and hip were defined using the International Society of Biomechanics (ISB)'s recommendation 20 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fifteen participants with CAI and 15 participants without any history of lateral ankle sprain (controls) were recruited in the study (Table 1). The specific inclusion criteria for the CAI group were determined based on the International Ankle Consortium's position statement 2 and included (i) the first lateral ankle sprain occurred at least 12 months ago (ii) reports of the previously injured joint “giving way” and/or recurrent sprain and/or “feelings of instability”, (iii) Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) 15 scoring <24, FAAM‐ADL score <90%, 19 FAAM‐Sports score <80%, (iv) participating in >90 min or more of physical activity per week which involved jump landing movements. Apart from the general requirements based on the International Ankle Consortium's position statement, 2 another requirement of jumping activity was used in this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%