1970
DOI: 10.2307/2575571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prejudice Versus Discrimination: An Empirical Example and Theoretical Extension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Significant but relatively low attitudebehavior relations were also reported by Warner and DeFleur (1969) and Warner and Dennis (1970). Warner and DeFleur measured attitudes toward blacks by means of a 16-item Likert scale.…”
Section: Lack Of Correspondence Between Action Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Significant but relatively low attitudebehavior relations were also reported by Warner and DeFleur (1969) and Warner and Dennis (1970). Warner and DeFleur measured attitudes toward blacks by means of a 16-item Likert scale.…”
Section: Lack Of Correspondence Between Action Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blacks as targets. In contrast with some of the research reviewed under Lack oj Correspondence, a few studies have measured attitudes toward blacks in general and have used criteria that involved specific actions with respect to hypothetical representatives of this racial group (DeFleur & Westie, 1958;Green, 1972;Linn, 1965;Warner & DeFleur, 1969;Warner & Dennis, 1970). Attitudinal and behavioral entities thus corresponded in their target elements (blacks) but not in their action elements.…”
Section: Lack Of Correspondence Between Action Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This view has become dominant such that many social distance measures are synonymous with racial/ethnic difference (Bogardus 1947;Jargowsky 1996;Johnson and Marini 1998;Jones 1991;Portes 1984;Rosenbaum 1992;Verkuyten and Kinket 2000;Warner and Dennis 1970). Thus, it is the perception of difference between individuals and members of various other racial/ethnic groups that is conceptualized as social distance (Canon and Mathews 1971;Evans and Giles 1986;Matthews and Westie 1966;Payne, York, and Fagan 1974;Siegel and Shepherd 1959).…”
Section: Determinants Of Social Distancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important variable in discrimination studies is the effect of the subject's reference groups on his inter-racial behaviour. Warner and De Fleur (1969) and Warner and Dennis (1970) suggest that the reference group norm has a strong effect on the subject's "public" behaviour. When their subjects expected inter-racial behaviour to be made public to conservative reference groups outside a university setting (e.g., family), they were less willing to behave positively toward blacks than they were when only "liberal" reference groups in the university would know of their behaviour.…”
Section: Public Vs Private Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%