2006
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.887740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prejudging Judges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A commonly researched consideration in the legal arena of the public sector is the value of electing or appointing officials (Borgne & Lockwood, 2006;Bratton & Spill, 2002;Nash, 2006;Selzer, 2006;C. Taylor, 2009).…”
Section: Ags Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A commonly researched consideration in the legal arena of the public sector is the value of electing or appointing officials (Borgne & Lockwood, 2006;Bratton & Spill, 2002;Nash, 2006;Selzer, 2006;C. Taylor, 2009).…”
Section: Ags Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have yet to agree on the best practice for selecting individuals for positions of legal influence that require both managing the organization and interpreting and acting within the law (Choi, Gulati, & Posner, 2008;Czarnezki, 2005;Nash, 2006;Wilson, 2006). Appointed and elected leaders may face term limits ranging from 2 to 8 years depending on the legislative limitations imposed on the position (Moncrief, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…459 Indeed, a commentator recently argued that the phenomenon of "prejudging judges" is more pronounced in the appointment process than in elections. 460 In any event, the debate over the relative merits of the two methods promises to remain academic, as citizens persist in refusing to yield the franchise. And whatever the politics of judicial elections, they are unlikely to be hindered by restraints on campaign speech in the years to come.…”
Section: ]mentioning
confidence: 99%