1991
DOI: 10.1063/1.347873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preisach modeling of magnetostrictive hysteresis

Abstract: Preisach-type models are suggested for the description of strain hysteresis of magnetostrictive materials. It is pointed out that the strain hysteresis has some peculiar properties in comparison with magnetic hysteresis. These peculiarities of strain hysteresis are discussed in detail along with the identification problem for these models.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Phenomenological models, on the other hand, are used to produce behaviors similar to those of physical systems without necessarily providing physical insight into the problems. A popular phenomenological hysteresis model adopted for smart materials is the Preisach model (Adly, Mayergoyz & Bergqvis, 1991;Hughes & Wen, 1994;Ge & Jouaneh, 1996;Gorbet, Wang, & Morris, 1998;Cruz-Hernandez & Hayward, 2001;Tan, Venkataraman, & Krishnaprasad, 2001;Natale, Velardi, & Visone, 2001;Croft, Shed, & Devasia, 2001), where the hysteresis is modeled as a (weighted) aggregate e ect of all possible delayed relay elements. A similar operator using delayed relays of ÿnite slopes, called Krasnosel'skii -Pokrovskii (KP) operator, has also been used ( Banks, Kurdila, & Webb, 1997;Galinaitis & Rogers, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phenomenological models, on the other hand, are used to produce behaviors similar to those of physical systems without necessarily providing physical insight into the problems. A popular phenomenological hysteresis model adopted for smart materials is the Preisach model (Adly, Mayergoyz & Bergqvis, 1991;Hughes & Wen, 1994;Ge & Jouaneh, 1996;Gorbet, Wang, & Morris, 1998;Cruz-Hernandez & Hayward, 2001;Tan, Venkataraman, & Krishnaprasad, 2001;Natale, Velardi, & Visone, 2001;Croft, Shed, & Devasia, 2001), where the hysteresis is modeled as a (weighted) aggregate e ect of all possible delayed relay elements. A similar operator using delayed relays of ÿnite slopes, called Krasnosel'skii -Pokrovskii (KP) operator, has also been used ( Banks, Kurdila, & Webb, 1997;Galinaitis & Rogers, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, they require huge efforts in identification procedures and high computational weight, so resulting unsuitable for sensing or actuation tasks. As a consequence, other approaches have been considered with the aim to gather good generality and modeling capabilities to a relative simple handling and computational effort, [28], [1], [42]. There, the basic concern was to fully exploit the "machinery" of the classical hysteresis operators, well suited to link together one input to one output.…”
Section: Hysteresis Operators and Their Basic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phenomenological models, on the other hand, are used to mimic the behaviors of the physical systems without necessarily providing physical insight into the problems. A well-known phenomenological hysteresis model for ferromagnetic as well as smart materials is the Preisach model, Adly et al (1991), Hughes and Wen (1995), Ge and Jouaneh (1996), Gorbet et al (1998), Cruz-Hernández andHayward (2001), Tan et al (2001), Croft et al (2001), where the hysteresis is modeled as a (weighted) aggregate effect of all possible relay elements that are delayed with respect to each others. Particularly, the Preisach model has been adopted as an effective hysteresis model of ER fluids, Han et al (2003), piezoelectric materials, Ge and Jouaneh (1997) and Shape Memory Alloys, Gorbet et al (1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%