1969
DOI: 10.3998/mpub.11395036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prehistory and Human Ecology of the Deh Luran Plain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0
1

Year Published

1971
1971
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
59
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…72 Their intended function can be manifold, including their use as pins and studs as suggested by Perlès. Their potential (additional) use as personal ornaments for lip-pins or ear-plugs is not only indicated by the (slightly later) Vinča figurines displaying corresponding body modification but also in the well-known practices from various indigenous peoples as discussed by Sergej Karmanski. 73 Labrets 74 are also known from the Pre-Pottery-Neolithic and Neolithic to Chalcolithic Near East, such as in Chogha Mish (Iran), 75 where depictions, as well as in-situ contexts of these objects in clay or stone, demonstrate their functional interpretation as body-piercings in our view. Anyhow, further analyses of the horned clay objects in the Starčevo horizon appear worthwhile and should include use-wear studies as well as their role in the 'Neolithic package' in the future.…”
Section: Tools Ornaments and Ritual Objectsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…72 Their intended function can be manifold, including their use as pins and studs as suggested by Perlès. Their potential (additional) use as personal ornaments for lip-pins or ear-plugs is not only indicated by the (slightly later) Vinča figurines displaying corresponding body modification but also in the well-known practices from various indigenous peoples as discussed by Sergej Karmanski. 73 Labrets 74 are also known from the Pre-Pottery-Neolithic and Neolithic to Chalcolithic Near East, such as in Chogha Mish (Iran), 75 where depictions, as well as in-situ contexts of these objects in clay or stone, demonstrate their functional interpretation as body-piercings in our view. Anyhow, further analyses of the horned clay objects in the Starčevo horizon appear worthwhile and should include use-wear studies as well as their role in the 'Neolithic package' in the future.…”
Section: Tools Ornaments and Ritual Objectsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Pioneering investigations on the origins of agriculture were conducted in this region in the 1940s-1970s at sites such as Asiab, Ganj Dareh, Ali Kosh and Jarmo (Braidwood et al, 1983;Hole et al, 1969;Smith, 1990), recently 14 C dated by Zeder (2008: table 3). New excavations at a wide range of Neolithic sites in the Zagros are currently being conducted in both Iran (R Matthews and Fazeli, 2013) and Iraq .…”
Section: Zagros Case Studies: Sites and History Of Investigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on evidence from various sites, it was not until around 8,500 years cal. BP that domestic pigs reached the southernmost end of the Levant (Horwitz et al 1999), lowland southwestern Iran (Hole, Flannery, and Neely 1969), or central Anatolia (Martin, Russell, and Carruthers 2002). This new evidence demonstrates that the TZA formed as an independent center of domestication and not as a secondary or receptive one, challenging previously long--held models.…”
Section: Pig Domestication In the Taurus-zagros Arcmentioning
confidence: 99%