Prehistoric Archaeology on the Continental Shelf 2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-9635-9_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prehistoric Site Discovery on the Outer Continental Shelf, Gulf of Mexico, United States of America

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Benjamin et al, 2011). However, most sites and finds have emerged from the seabed or obscured under mobile sediments, and few sites have been discovered from buried contexts (Pearson et al, 2014). Due to the global nature of eustatic processes, there is potential for encountering submerged prehistoric material worldwide (Bailey and Flemming, 2008;Evans et al, 2014) and Palaeolithic material has been recovered from other underwater contexts (e.g.…”
Section: Submerged Prehistory In Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Benjamin et al, 2011). However, most sites and finds have emerged from the seabed or obscured under mobile sediments, and few sites have been discovered from buried contexts (Pearson et al, 2014). Due to the global nature of eustatic processes, there is potential for encountering submerged prehistoric material worldwide (Bailey and Flemming, 2008;Evans et al, 2014) and Palaeolithic material has been recovered from other underwater contexts (e.g.…”
Section: Submerged Prehistory In Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thousands of square kilometers of formerly subaerial coastal plain lie submerged today; much of it within the Gulf of Mexico along the western continental shelf of Florida and the South Atlantic Bight along the Georgia coastline [114][115][116]. Multiple examples exist of attempts to develop systematic approaches to detect high probability areas for submerged prehistoric sites since the 1970s, when the National Park Service funded the first of multiple studies aimed at paleolandscape reconstruction and identification of high probability zones for prehistoric archaeological sites [117][118][119].…”
Section: The Southeastern Us Outer Continental Shelfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the western Gulf of Mexico, Coastal Environments, Incorporated, developed a comprehensive landscape model that synthesized geological, geomorphological, and archaeological data, assessed areas for preservation potentials, and then developed a sedimentologically based model for detecting archaeological sediments using coring [117,118]. From these baseline studies, they then launched geophysical surveys along Sabine Pass, Texas, followed by coring that yielded archaeological materials that are deeply buried [119,122]. Later in the 1980s, the Minerals Management Service (MMS), Department of the Interior of the United States (now Bureau of Ocean Energy Management [BOEM]) funded work at McFaddin Beach on the north Texas coastline, where potential sources for archaeological materials remain highly enigmatic [123,124].…”
Section: The Southeastern Us Outer Continental Shelfmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are advantages to marine industry too and so the mutually beneficial strategies to facilitate collaboration should not be underestimated. International examples have demonstrated how industry and research communities have successfully collaborated to study palaeolandscapes globally, including the North Sea, Baltic, and Gulf of Mexico (Fitch and Gaffney 2009;Russell and Tizzard 2011;Holmlund et al 2017;Pearson et al 2014;Moree and Sier 2015;Peeters and Amkreutz 2020). It is also ethically important that industry and archaeological communities recognise the cultural significance of sea country and its value to Traditional Owners and local communities (McNiven 2004).…”
Section: Improving Submerged Landscape Archaeology Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%