BACKGROUND
Preterm birth remains a significant cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Women with a prior preterm birth are at risk for recurrent preterm birth. Treatment with 17-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate has become standard-of-care for women with prior preterm birth to help reduce this risk. Factors that affect a woman’s decision to use this medication are largely unknown.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of our study was to investigate patient level barriers to 17-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate use. We studied a cohort of women eligible for 17-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate with the hypothesis that 17-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate is underutilized and certain patient characteristics, such as obstetrical history, influence its use.
STUDY DESIGN
A cross-sectional study of all women seen at a specialty prematurity clinic from 2009 to 2013 was performed. Women with a singleton pregnancy were included if they had a prior spontaneous preterm birth. Chi-squared tests were performed for univariate analyses. Multivariable logistic regression was used to control for confounders.
RESULTS
243 women had 17-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate recommended to them based on prior obstetrical history. There were 218 women with a pregnancy during our study period that were included in our analysis. 163 (74.7%) had documented 17-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate use. Women were more likely to accept 17-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate if they had a history of a second trimester loss only (OR 2.32, 1.17–4.58) or received recommendation for cerclage due to a short cervical length (OR 4.12, 1.55–10.99). Women with a prior full-term birth were less likely to accept 17-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (OR 0.48, 0.26–0.89), especially when the prior full-term birth was subsequent rather than prior to the preterm birth (OR 0.19, 0.08–0.47). Race, obesity, and insurance status did not impact 17-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate use. There was no difference in the rate of spontaneous preterm birth between those who used and did not use 17-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (37.2 vs. 34.0%, p=0.7).
CONCLUSION
Past obstetric history impacted 17-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate use. This study identifies biases regarding 17-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate at the patient level and can be used to develop strategies to increase its use. However, the similarity in the spontaneous preterm birth rate between users and non-users highlights the importance of identifying specific populations where 17-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate is and is not effective in preventing preterm birth.