2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcf.2019.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pregnancy outcome in women with cystic fibrosis and poor pulmonary function

Abstract: Background: To investigate how poor pre-gestational pulmonary function influenced pregnancy outcome and clinical status evolution in women with cystic fibrosis. Methods: Pregnancies in women without lung transplantation with a first delivery reported to the French cystic fibrosis registry between 20 0 0 and 2012 were identified. Pregnancy outcomes and clinical trends (body mass index-BMI, and pulmonary function) over a 4-year follow-up in women with poor pregestational pulmonary function, defined as forced exp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
24
1
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(14 reference statements)
2
24
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In relation to the type of birth, it has been reported that 41.9% of CF women with a ppFEV1 of <50% [15] and 45.4% of those giving birth prematurely [13] undergo caesarean sections, whereas we found that a much higher proportion of cases (63.64%) were managed by means of a caesarean delivery. Our data show that there is no association between caesarean delivery and the severity of pre-conception respiratory function impairment, the age of the mother or her nutritional status by genotype, but there is a more significant association with a severe genotype than with the presence of at least one RF or VCC variant (p = 0.042).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In relation to the type of birth, it has been reported that 41.9% of CF women with a ppFEV1 of <50% [15] and 45.4% of those giving birth prematurely [13] undergo caesarean sections, whereas we found that a much higher proportion of cases (63.64%) were managed by means of a caesarean delivery. Our data show that there is no association between caesarean delivery and the severity of pre-conception respiratory function impairment, the age of the mother or her nutritional status by genotype, but there is a more significant association with a severe genotype than with the presence of at least one RF or VCC variant (p = 0.042).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…A number of reports [5][6][7][8][9][10] have documented the effect of pregnancy on the clinical status of women with CF, but less is known about perinatal outcomes [11][12][13]. Other than the annual number of pregnancies, the American, British, Canadian and Australian CF registries provide no information in terms of gestational age or type of labour; only the French registry reports some data concerning perinatal outcomes [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the same reason, this study is unable to elucidate maternal or neonatal outcomes beyond the immediate postnatal period. Studies investigating longer‐term outcomes have reported a decline in lung function and a higher chance of death in the years after pregnancy in women with a lower pre‐pregnancy FEV 1 , 5,9 although a recent study of French registry data did not demonstrate a difference in decline in lung function over a 2‐year post‐pregnancy period in women with FEV 1 <50% compared with women who had FEV 1 >50% predicted 11 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Pre‐pregnancy lung function is often cited as the most important factor in predicting pregnancy outcomes for both mother and baby. Forced expiratory volume in 1 minute (FEV 1 ) of <60% predicted correlates with increased risk of premature delivery, 5–9 delivery by caesarean section 5,6 and adverse fetal outcomes such as low birthweight and perinatal death 6,10,11 . Guidelines for the management of pregnant women with CF were published in 2008 12 suggesting that an FEV 1 of <50% predicted should be considered an absolute contraindication to pregnancy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation