1982
DOI: 10.2307/1380451
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pregnancy Failure in the Red-Backed Vole, Clethrionomys gapperi

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 ). Overall, these results confirm earlier findings: in many rodent species, females breeding for the first time were more likely to interrupt their pregnancy than parous females after male turnover (Stehn and Jannett 1981 ; Clulow et al 1982 , but see Chipman and Fox 1966 ). Moreover, younger females are more likely to interrupt a pregnancy than older females (Clulow and Langford 1971 ; Heske 1987 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2 ). Overall, these results confirm earlier findings: in many rodent species, females breeding for the first time were more likely to interrupt their pregnancy than parous females after male turnover (Stehn and Jannett 1981 ; Clulow et al 1982 , but see Chipman and Fox 1966 ). Moreover, younger females are more likely to interrupt a pregnancy than older females (Clulow and Langford 1971 ; Heske 1987 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Since in previous experiments on the Bruce effect in other rodent species (e.g., Clulow et al 1982 ) not all but a fraction of females terminated pregnancies after male replacement, we expected a bimodal distribution of birth dates for the replaced male treatments, including a first peak of early births around day 20 and a second peak of late births around day 27. For the returned male treatment, we expected a unimodal distribution, peaking at early births around experimental day 20.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is possible that more of the reported cases of strange-male induced pregnancy block in the literature could be reinterpreted as responses to the removal of the mate. Such a literature already exists, investigating the social factors involved in the maintenance of successful pregnancy in reflex ovulators: the presence of the mate for an extended time after mating has been demonstrated to have a significant, positive effect on the number of females which will successfully litter in field voles (Microtus ochrogaster; Richmond & Stehn, 1976), montane voles (M. montanus; Berger & Negus, 1982), meadow voles (M. pennsylvanicus; Storey, 1986) and redbacked voles (Clethrionomys gapperi; Clulow et al, 1982).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interruption of early pregnancy (before implantation), also known as pregnancy block or 'Bruce effect' [32][33][34], has been discussed to reduce a female's investment into offspring that might afterwards be killed by an unknown, invading male [35][36][37]. Pregnancy block has been recorded under both laboratory and wild conditions in carnivores [38], primates [39,40], rodents [32,34,41,42] and ungulates [43]. While female mice block pregnancy before implantation [32], other mammalian species, for instance, voles and rats, can obstruct pregnancies at later stages [42,[44][45][46][47][48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%