2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.05.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prefrontal cortex activation supports the emergence of early stone age toolmaking skill

Abstract: Trends toward encephalization and technological complexity ~1.8 million years ago may signify cognitive development in the genus Homo. Using functional near-infrared spectroscopy, we measured relative brain activity of 33 human subjects at three different points as they learned to make replicative Oldowan and Acheulian Early Stone Age tools. Here we show that the more complex early Acheulian industry recruits left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex when skills related to this task are first being learned. Individu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The conjunction of the two covariates reveals regions of left parietal operculum and rIFG ( pars opercularis) that are specifically responsive to stimulus complexity irrespective of measurement method. This is consistent with prior evidence of inferior frontoparietal functional activation 31 , 32 , 67 69 and structural remodeling 70 in response to stone tool making, which have previously been interpreted using informal, qualitative estimations of technological complexity and reverse inference from published studies of other tasks. Parameterization of complexity through grammar extraction now allows direct identification of activity driven by sequence structure and more specific localization to cognitive control 71 , 72 and multisensory integration 73 regions of inferior frontal and parietal cortex.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The conjunction of the two covariates reveals regions of left parietal operculum and rIFG ( pars opercularis) that are specifically responsive to stimulus complexity irrespective of measurement method. This is consistent with prior evidence of inferior frontoparietal functional activation 31 , 32 , 67 69 and structural remodeling 70 in response to stone tool making, which have previously been interpreted using informal, qualitative estimations of technological complexity and reverse inference from published studies of other tasks. Parameterization of complexity through grammar extraction now allows direct identification of activity driven by sequence structure and more specific localization to cognitive control 71 , 72 and multisensory integration 73 regions of inferior frontal and parietal cortex.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The conjunction of the two covariates reveals regions of left parietal operculum and rIFG (pars opercularis) that are specifically responsive to stimulus complexity irrespective of measurement method. This is consistent with prior evidence of inferior frontoparietal functional activation 31,32,[67][68][69] and structural remodeling 70 in response to stone tool making, which have previously been interpreted using informal, qualitative estimations of technological complexity and reverse inference from published studies of other tasks. Parameterization of complexity through grammar extraction now allows direct identification of activity driven by sequence structure and more specific localization to cognitive control 71,72 and multisensory integration 73 regions of inferior frontal and parietal cortex.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This proposed linkage between the complex nested routines of cleaver-making and the use of symbols (words) as scaffolds for managing the sequencing of tasks, complements neuroimaging research on shared networks for tool-making and language (Uomini and Meyer 2013;Meyer et al 2014;Stout et al 2015;Putt et al 2019), and the experimental studies showing the effectiveness of teaching with language in learning complex tool-making routines (Morgan et al 2015;Lombao et al 2017).…”
Section: Choice Among Ways Of Making-equifinalitymentioning
confidence: 63%