2018
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preferred Tempo and Low-Audio-Frequency Bias Emerge From Simulated Sub-cortical Processing of Sounds With a Musical Beat

Abstract: Prior research has shown that musical beats are salient at the level of the cortex in humans. Yet below the cortex there is considerable sub-cortical processing that could influence beat perception. Some biases, such as a tempo preference and an audio frequency bias for beat timing, could result from sub-cortical processing. Here, we used models of the auditory-nerve and midbrain-level amplitude modulation filtering to simulate sub-cortical neural activity to various beat-inducing stimuli, and we used the simu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
3
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is therefore particularly worth noting the strong correspondences observed here between auditory cortical firing rates and tapping behaviour, and how well these correspondences could be captured by a standard LN model. Our findings suggest that fundamental, low-level mechanisms such as adaptation [13], amplitude modulation tuning [53] and temporal contrasts in STRFs play a formative role in musical beat perception. This is consistent with the idea that the induction of beat is the result of an interaction between 'bottom-up' sensory processes and 'top-down' cognitive ones [54], perhaps through the application of learned and implicit rhythmic priors [6,7] onto an ascending sensory representation [13,53].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…It is therefore particularly worth noting the strong correspondences observed here between auditory cortical firing rates and tapping behaviour, and how well these correspondences could be captured by a standard LN model. Our findings suggest that fundamental, low-level mechanisms such as adaptation [13], amplitude modulation tuning [53] and temporal contrasts in STRFs play a formative role in musical beat perception. This is consistent with the idea that the induction of beat is the result of an interaction between 'bottom-up' sensory processes and 'top-down' cognitive ones [54], perhaps through the application of learned and implicit rhythmic priors [6,7] onto an ascending sensory representation [13,53].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…However, 433 the temporal features that generate these responses may differ. Midbrain neuron models with 434 different synaptic parameters optimally capture vowel formant and beat-related information in 435 speech and music respectively (Carney et al, 2015;Zuk et al, 2018). The specializations for 436 speech and music in the auditory cortex may have underpinnings at earlier processing stages in 437 the auditory system.…”
Section: Discussion: 397mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then subtracted the spectra from null spectra generated by randomizing the phases in the reconstructions for each subject and averaging these randomized reconstructions (see Zhu et al, 2013;Keshishzadeh et al, 2020) (Figure 6d). From these adjusted spectral values we identified the peaks occurring at the tempo of the music (see Methods) as well as 2 -4x the tempo, since the peak energy may occur at multiples of the expected musical beat frequency of the music based on the acoustics (Ding et al, 2017) or neural activity following subcortical processing (Zuk et al, 2018).…”
Section: Drums In Rock Music Tracked At Multiples Of the Musical Beatmentioning
confidence: 99%