Preferred reporting items in green space health research. Guiding principles for an interdisciplinary field.

Cardinali, Marcel; Beenackers, Mariëlle A.; Timmeren, Arjan van; Pottgiesser, Uta

doi:10.1016/j.envres.2023.115893

Cited by 12 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 51 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These inconsistencies are most likely the result of differences in study design, such as differences in the study population, greenness and outcome measures used, duration of study period, and used statistical methods [ 88 ]. A recent review article by Cardinali et al [ 23 ] addressed these inconsistencies and proposed guiding principles to enhance synchronization of studies in the field of green space and health.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This can be achieved by using measures that account for other aspects of the green environment such as type [ 17 ] or diversity of green [ 24 , 25 ], as the mechanisms between greenness exposure, PA and SB might not be fully captured by a single metric. This is only endorsed by the lack of consensus on the type and amount of greenness exposure needed to maximize health gains in the population [ 23 , 26 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Longitudinal study of changes in greenness exposure, physical activity and sedentary behavior in the ORISCAV-LUX cohort study

van Beek,

Malisoux,

Klein

et al. 2024

Int J Health Geogr

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Greenness exposure has been associated with many health benefits, for example through the pathway of providing opportunities for physical activity (PA). Beside the limited body of longitudinal research, most studies overlook to what extent different types of greenness exposures may be associated with varying levels of PA and sedentary behavior (SB). In this study, we investigated associations of greenness characterized by density, diversity and vegetation type with self-reported PA and SB over a 9-year period, using data from the ORISCAV-LUX study (2007–2017, n = 628). Methods The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) short form was used to collect PA and SB outcomes. PA was expressed as MET-minutes/week and log-transformed, and SB was expressed as sitting time in minutes/day. Geographic Information Systems (ArcGIS Pro, ArcMap) were used to collect the following exposure variables: Tree Cover Density (TCD), Soil-adjusted Vegetation Index (SAVI), and Green Land Use Mix (GLUM). The exposure variables were derived from publicly available sources using remote sensing and cartographic resources. Greenness exposure was calculated within 1000m street network buffers around participants’ exact residential address. Results Using Random Effects Within-Between (REWB) models, we found evidence of negative within-individual associations of TCD with PA (β = − 2.60, 95% CI − 4.75; − 0.44), and negative between-individual associations of GLUM and PA (β = − 2.02, 95% CI − 3.73; − 0.32). There was no evidence for significant associations between greenness exposure and SB. Significant interaction effects by sex were present for the associations between TCD and both PA and SB. Neighborhood socioeconomic status (NSES) did not modify the effect of greenness exposure on PA and SB in the 1000 m buffer. Discussion Our results showed that the relationship between greenness exposure and PA depended on the type of greenness measure used, which stresses the need for the use of more diverse and complementary greenness measures in future research. Tree vegetation and greenness diversity, and changes therein, appeared to relate to PA, with distinct effects among men and women. Replication studies are needed to confirm the relevance of using different greenness measures to understand its’ different associations with PA and SB.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Longitudinal study of changes in greenness exposure, physical activity and sedentary behavior in the ORISCAV-LUX cohort study

van Beek,

Malisoux,

Klein

et al. 2024

Int J Health Geogr

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Especially regarding virtual exposure, the description of greenspace is needed in order to investigate these technologies potentials, shortcomings, as well as potential risks within future research. The usage of reporting frameworks for exposures and outcomes, e.g., PRIGSHARE for satellite based greenspace assessments ( 172 ) can improve the comprehensibility and thus the quality of evidence.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Current methodologies of greenspace exposure and mental health research—a scoping review

Freymueller,

Schmid,

Senkler

et al. 2024

Front. Public Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionGreenspaces can provide an important resource for human mental health. A growing body of literature investigates the interaction and the influence of diverse greenspace exposures. In order to gain a comprehensive understanding of the complex connection between greenspace and mental health, a variety of perspectives and methodological combinations are needed. The aim of this review is to assess the current methodologies researching greenspace and mental health.MethodsA scoping review was conducted. Four electronic databases (Pubmed, Embase, PsycInfo, Web of Science) were searched for relevant studies. A wide range of greenspace and mental health keywords were included to provide a comprehensive representation of the body of research. Relevant information on publication characteristics, types of greenspaces, mental health outcomes, and measurements of greenspace exposure and mental health was extracted and assessed.Results338 studies were included. The included studies encompassed a multitude of methods, as well as outcomes for both greenspace and mental health. 28 combinations were found between seven categories each for greenspace and mental health assessment. Some pairings such as geoinformation systems for greenspace assessment and questionnaires investigating mental health were used much more frequently than others, implying possible research gaps. Furthermore, we identified problems and inconsistences in reporting of greenspace types and mental health outcomes.DiscussionThe identified methodological variety is a potential for researching the complex connections between greenspace and mental health. Commonly used combinations can provide important insights. However, future research needs to emphasize other perspectives in order to understand how to create living environments with mental health benefits. For this purpose, interdisciplinary research is necessary.

show abstract

“…As hybrid disciplines, design, architecture, and planning are the result of both technological quantities and artistic qualities, but not all spatial qualities are readily quantifiable or standardized [25]. Additionally, recent studies confirmed the complexity of addressing the multidimensional effects of green space, necessitating the integration of diverse research disciplines: the high heterogeneity of study designs, exposure assessments, and outcomes underscore the call for greater rigor, precision, and robustness [26]. Regarding practical application, the beneficial effects of Biophilic Design (BD) have been extensively documented, primarily due to their small-scale and immediate outcomes.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Yet, although the beneficial effects of Biophilic Design (BD) are well documented thanks to the small-scale and immediate outcomes, the long-term potential of Biophilic Urbanism (BU) offers less evidence, limiting its utilization and investment. Meanwhile, BU is taking place in an increasing number of metropolises, where nature plays a key role in maintaining ecological continuity and safeguarding the local identity within bioregional systems [26].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Biophilia Upscaling: A Systematic Literature Review Based on a Three-Metric Approach

Lefosse,

van Timmeren,

Ratti

2023

Sustainability

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In response to socio-ecological challenges, cities around the world are implementing greenification and urban forestry. While these strategies contribute to reducing the ecological footprint, they often overlook various social implications. This explains the increasing global attention to Biophilia, which emphasizes human–nature interaction to enhance the quality of urban life. Despite its historical roots spanning centuries, Biophilia is still considered an emerging research field, as shown by debate on evidence-based research and measurement of its multidimensional impacts. Although the beneficial effects of Biophilic Design (BD) are well documented thanks to the small-scale and immediate outcomes, the long-term potential of Biophilic Urbanism (BU) offers less evidence, limiting its utilization and investment. This paper provides a comprehensive theoretical-practical framework on Biophilia, BD, and BU through a 60-year systematic literature review based on a three-metric approach (quality, quantity, and application). Investigating concepts and practices, we delve into biophilic effects on humans and urban livability, analyze tools to measure them, and explore methods to translate them into the built environment. In spite of the growing body of studies and advancements in the last decade, our review findings highlight the need for further insights, especially regarding BU. The study aims to promote Biophilia Upscaling as a strategy to maximize its direct and indirect benefits across urban scales, thereby promoting BU and expediting a paradigm shift in city planning. In metropolises conceived as bioregional systems, where nature plays a key role in ensuring ecological services and citizens’ well-being, BU can assist designers, planners, and city makers in addressing the urban agenda toward higher environmental and social standards.

show abstract

Preferred reporting items in green space health research. Guiding principles for an interdisciplinary field.

Cited by 12 publications

References 51 publications

Longitudinal study of changes in greenness exposure, physical activity and sedentary behavior in the ORISCAV-LUX cohort study

Longitudinal study of changes in greenness exposure, physical activity and sedentary behavior in the ORISCAV-LUX cohort study

Current methodologies of greenspace exposure and mental health research—a scoping review

Biophilia Upscaling: A Systematic Literature Review Based on a Three-Metric Approach

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About