1990
DOI: 10.1016/0145-2126(90)90128-v
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preferential uptake of benzoporphyrin derivative by leukemic versus normal cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Verteporfin selectively pools in choroidal haemangioma because of numerous vascular channels in the tumour and possibly by the uptake of the lining endothelial cells. 14,15 The mechanism of cell destruction in cases of choroidal haemangioma is presumed to be because of a combination of direct cytotoxicity and vascular occlusion. 8 We have followed the standard PDT protocol used for treatment of subretinal neovascular membranes with excellent results in choroidal haemangiomas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Verteporfin selectively pools in choroidal haemangioma because of numerous vascular channels in the tumour and possibly by the uptake of the lining endothelial cells. 14,15 The mechanism of cell destruction in cases of choroidal haemangioma is presumed to be because of a combination of direct cytotoxicity and vascular occlusion. 8 We have followed the standard PDT protocol used for treatment of subretinal neovascular membranes with excellent results in choroidal haemangiomas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Photoactivation of the chlorin‐type photosensitizer, benzoporphyrin derivative monoacid ring A (BPD‐MA), eradicates tumor cells through the generation of reactive oxygen intermediates [15]. BPD‐MA accumulates at higher levels in leukemic cells as compared to normal blood mononuclear cells [15, 16]. In vitro experiments have shown that photoactivation of BPD‐MA can selectively deplete leukemic cells while relatively sparing normal hematopoietic progenitor cells [16, 17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Autologous HSCT (Auto-HSCT) enjoys several advantages over allogeneic HSCT (Allo-HSCT): easy transplantation of grafts, without the restriction of age and the need for an HLA-matched donor, the absence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and a small percentage of life-threatening infections. [1][2][3][4] It has been proven that auto-HSCT is a promising approach for leukemia therapy. However, it still has its limitation of high relapse rate, as compared with Allo-HSCT and the limitation is ascribed to the risk of reinfusing residual leukemic cells at the time of harvest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%