2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.catcom.2007.12.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preferential oxidation of CO in H2 rich stream over Au/CeO2–Co3O4 catalysts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As compared with cobalt oxide and ceria catalysts, integrating cobalt oxides with ceria can further enhance the redox behavior for CO [10,13,14]. Thus, catalytically active Co and Ce sites in Co 3 O 4 -CeO 2 composite oxides can cooperatively enhance the catalytic activity [15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As compared with cobalt oxide and ceria catalysts, integrating cobalt oxides with ceria can further enhance the redox behavior for CO [10,13,14]. Thus, catalytically active Co and Ce sites in Co 3 O 4 -CeO 2 composite oxides can cooperatively enhance the catalytic activity [15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As can be seen in Figure 4, two zones stand out in the TPR profiles. According to some literature reports13, 17, 18 the zone at low temperature (<270 °C) should be attributed to the reduction of CoOOH and Co 3 O 4 to Co 2+ , whereas the second zone, in the temperature range 270–520 °C, should be ascribed to the reduction of Co 2+ to Co 0 . However, mass balance calculations for the samples for which the composition was known (in terms of CoOOH and Co 3 O 4 content; see Table 1) show that the reduction of the cobalt species to Co 2+ in the first zone is incomplete.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Nevertheless, the catalytic performance of supported Au catalysts depends on their size and dispersion [40][41][42]. Comparison the catalytic performance when using different supporter (Au/CuO, Au/CeO 2 , Au/(50:50)CuO-CeO 2 catalysts), the Au/(50:50)CuO-CeO 2 catalyst expressed higher methanol conversion with lower CO selectivity than that of Au/CuO and Au/CeO 2 catalysts in a whole range of operating temperature from 200 8C to 300 8C.…”
Section: Supported Au Catalystsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bimetallic Au-Cu/TiO 2 catalysts were found to be more active in the POM reaction than the use of the monometallic Au/TiO 2 and Cu/TiO 2 catalysts, because of metal-metal interaction [39]. Nano-sized gold supported catalysts are extremely interesting due to their high CO reduction activity at low temperatures [40]. Previously the evaluation of the activities of Au catalysts in the CO-PROX reaction revealed that PtAu/CeO 2 and PtAu/CeO 2 ZnO catalysts were active for CO reduction at low temperatures [41,42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%