Preferential flow descriptions for structured soils

Abstract

In heterogeneous structured soils, water and transported dissolved substances and suspended particles and colloids may under certain conditions bypass most of the soil porous matrix thereby creating nonequilibrium conditions in pressure heads and solute concentrations between preferential flow paths and the soil matrix pore region. Preferential flow severely limits the applicability of standard models for flow and transport that are mostly based on Richards' equation and the convection‐dispersion equation. A number of various model approaches have been proposed to overcome this problem. These models mostly try to separately describe flow and transport in preferred flow paths and slow or stagnant pore regions. Discrete fracture models are more frequently suggested in hydrogeology and often more empirically for cracked clay soils. The two‐domain approach assumes two interacting porous continua for either mobile‐immobile (compartment models) or mobile‐mobile pore systems for solute transport and for water movement. Such models were derived by rigorous “upscaling” methods (microstructure models), or by more empirically assuming two macroscopic scale systems. Representation of effective local (i.e., structural) geometry remains a problem when applying these models to soil systems. The dual‐permeability models differ in the description of flow in the preferential flow domain (i.e., either Richards' equation assuming capillarity or kinematic wave approach for gravity flow) and with respect to the mass‐transfer formulation (i.e., from pressure head– or saturation‐based first‐order type formulations to more complex nonlinear formulations or numerical solutions of the local flow equation). Despite the enormous progress that has been accomplished to improve both the modeling as well as the parameter determination, many challenges remain, in particular, how to capture dynamic soil structure effects to improve quantitative understanding and descriptions of preferential flow and transport processes.

A review of model applications for structured soils: a) Water flow and tracer transport

“…The PF model concepts are only briefly explained here. For details, the reader is referred to recent review articles by Šimůnek et al (2003), Gerke (2006), Jarvis (2007), and Šimůnek and van Genuchten (2008). Here, the emphasis is on the applications of such models in describing experimental observations.…”

A model of hydrological and mechanical feedbacks of preferential fissure flow in a slow-moving landslide

“…Presence of fissures creates so called "dual permeability" systems that consider the porous medium as two interacting and overlapping, but distinct continuum with water flow occurring in both continua (Gwo et al, 1995;Greco et al, 2002;Simůnek et al, 2003;Gerke, 2006;Jarvis, 2007). Fissures influence the time and intensity of groundwater recharge changing the storage capacity of a soil and affect the infiltration processes of rainfall or snowmelt (Bogaard, 2001;Van Asch et al, 2001;Bievre et al, 2011).…”

“…Krzeminska et al (2012) included more detailed representation of fissure flow in STARWARS model. Following a dual-permeability approach (Gerke, 2006;Šimůnek et al, 2003;Jarvis, 2007) they assumed the presence of two overlapping and interacting domains, the matrix and fissures blocks, having their own characteristic and properties (i.e., porosity, hydraulic conductivity) and allowing water flow in both domains.…”

Field investigation of preferential fissure flow paths with hydrochemical analysis of small-scale sprinkling experiments

“…Dual permeability theory (Gwo et al, 1995;Greco et al, 2002;Šimůnek et al, 2003;Gerke, 2006;Jarvis, 2007) considers the porous medium as two (or more) interacting and overlapping but yet distinct continua. The water flow occurs in both continua but it is mainly ruled by the fracture continuum (macropore or fissure), which generates preferential flow.…”