2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2012.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preferential feeding on high quality diets decreases methyl mercury of farm-raised common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.)

Abstract: This study on aquaculture ponds investigated how diet sources affect methyl mercury (MeHg) bioaccumulation of the worldwide key diet fish, common carp (Cyprinus carpio). We tested how MeHg concentrations of one and two year-old pond-raised carp changed with different food quality: a) zooplankton (natural pond diet), b) cereals enriched with vegetable oil (VO ponds), and c) compound feeds enriched with marine fish oils (FO ponds). It was hypothesized that carp preferentially feed on supplementary diets with the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…No benthic invertebrates were observed in sediments (analyses of sediments) or in carp guts (visual inspection of gut contents). While zooplankton were the major diet source in N, results of a previous study on stable isotope analysis (δ 13 C and δ 15 N) in these diets and carp showed that on average only 18% of supplied VO feeds, but 60% of FO were retained in carp [26]. Carp feeding on N and VO were smaller (28±3 cm and 29±2 cm, respectively) and lighter (723±238 g and 655±134 g, respectively) than carp feeding on FO (33±2 cm and 1413±228 g).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…No benthic invertebrates were observed in sediments (analyses of sediments) or in carp guts (visual inspection of gut contents). While zooplankton were the major diet source in N, results of a previous study on stable isotope analysis (δ 13 C and δ 15 N) in these diets and carp showed that on average only 18% of supplied VO feeds, but 60% of FO were retained in carp [26]. Carp feeding on N and VO were smaller (28±3 cm and 29±2 cm, respectively) and lighter (723±238 g and 655±134 g, respectively) than carp feeding on FO (33±2 cm and 1413±228 g).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…For carp, the CONTAM Panel have used the ingredients of commercial compound feeds for carp reported by Schultz et al. () to estimate the exposures for fish of 1 kg live weight and a feed intake of 0.022 kg dry matter/day (Appendix E, Tables and ).…”
Section: Food and Feed Consumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CONTAM Panel used the ingredients of commercial compound feeds for carp reported by Schultz et al. () to estimate exposure to DAS.…”
Section: Appendix E – Feed Intakes and Diet Composition (Livestock)mentioning
confidence: 99%