Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-5699(98)01257-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preferential expression of TCR Vα regions in CD4/CD8 subsets: class discrimination or co-receptor recognition?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TCR ␣-chain interactions have been shown to dominate the interface between the TCR and pMHC in many complexes (23), and recent evidence suggests that they are important in maintaining the roughly conserved docking orientation (37). In addition, V␣ genes have been reported to play a major role in determining whether T cells are MHC class I or class II restricted (38,39). Our data indicate that V␣ genes are also critical in determining MHC restriction between different class I alleles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…TCR ␣-chain interactions have been shown to dominate the interface between the TCR and pMHC in many complexes (23), and recent evidence suggests that they are important in maintaining the roughly conserved docking orientation (37). In addition, V␣ genes have been reported to play a major role in determining whether T cells are MHC class I or class II restricted (38,39). Our data indicate that V␣ genes are also critical in determining MHC restriction between different class I alleles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Our observations further indicate that small, germlineencoded molecular changes distal to the antigen-binding site of the TCR can have profound effects on the developmental biology of individual clonotypes. Since some of the molecular differences that are associated with avidity maturation of the IGRP 206-214 -reactive T cell population map to the CDR1α, and since some CDR1α residues (i.e., position 27) interact directly with MHC molecules (34)(35)(36), it is possible that the above differences in biophysical, functional, and developmental behavior are determined by differences in the strength with which these TCRs engage MHC molecules in the absence of cognate peptide ligand. In support of this hypothesis, we have observed that, unlike Vα17.4 + CTLs, Vα17.5 + CTLs can kill TUM-pulsed RMA-S-K d cells and can produce substantial amounts of IFN-γ in response to TUM-pulsed dendritic cells (our unpublished observations).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is quite likely that class I and class II MHC molecules actually look alike to TCR. In fact, there are no critical (although some) differences in V␣/V␤ usage between class I MHC-restricted and class II MHC-restricted TCRs (39,40). If this is the case, the coreceptor may well primarily determine the class restriction.…”
Section: The Interaction Of a Single Tcr With Multiple Mhc Upon Thymimentioning
confidence: 99%