2011
DOI: 10.1029/2011jf002061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preferential dust sources: A geomorphological classification designed for use in global dust-cycle models

Abstract: [1] We present a simple theoretical land-surface classification that can be used to determine the location and temporal behavior of preferential sources of terrestrial dust emissions. The classification also provides information about the likely nature of the sediments, their erodibility and the likelihood that they will generate emissions under given conditions. The scheme is based on the dual notions of geomorphic type and connectivity between geomorphic units. We demonstrate that the scheme can be used to m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

8
170
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
8
170
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The atmospheric dust load that originates from soils disturbed by human activities such as land use practices, which can be interpreted as "anthropogenic" dust (Tegen and Fung, 1995), can increase dust loading, which, in turn, affects the radiative forcing. It is critical to quantify the relative importance of different dust sources and the factors that affect dust emissions to understand the global dust cycle, including historical and future changes in dust emissions, as noted by Okin et al (2011) and Bullard et al (2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The atmospheric dust load that originates from soils disturbed by human activities such as land use practices, which can be interpreted as "anthropogenic" dust (Tegen and Fung, 1995), can increase dust loading, which, in turn, affects the radiative forcing. It is critical to quantify the relative importance of different dust sources and the factors that affect dust emissions to understand the global dust cycle, including historical and future changes in dust emissions, as noted by Okin et al (2011) and Bullard et al (2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This identification will enable us to look into the factors generating SDS more effectively (Esmaili et al, 2006a), and will improve our understanding of SDS mechanism and the effects of climate change and human activities on SDS occurrences. Despite the presence of abundant fine dust particles, SDS source regions exhibit spatial and temporal heterogeneities in dust emission characteristics, which makes the identification of SDS source areas a more complicated issue (Bullard et al, 2011;Bryant, 2013). The primary method to identify SDS source areas depends on ground-based point measurements that limit the ability to study events to large spatial scales (Esmaili et al, 2006b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remote sensing observations reported a higher correlation between dust emission events and strength of winds over the dune-covered units than winds over other geomorphic units of the Sahara Desert, the Chihuahuan Desert, the Lake Eyre Basin, and the Taklamakan Area (Bullard et al, 2011;Crouvi et al, 2012). Crouvi et al (2012) found that more than 40% of Saharan dust storms originated from sand dunes, and that sand dunes had a higher land 10 erodibility (regression of number of dust storms against surface wind) than other soil types.…”
Section: Introduction 25mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remote sensing observations are thus particularly informative for such regions, and these have informed delineation of regional dust emission patterns (Prospero et al, 2002). However, on smaller scales, uncertainties in 25 back-tracking satellite images to locate dust sources, combined with the lack of information on dust concentration, smallscale land-surface dynamics, and magnitude of wind stress, impede resolving the exact locations of dust sources (Bullard et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introduction 25mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation