2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.12.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preferences for cultural urban ecosystem services: Comparing attitudes, perception, and use

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

11
85
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
11
85
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It includes the research studies focused on the general identification of the population preferences for certain attributes of green spaces and those focused specifically on the identification of the attributes more significantly related to use frequency. These studies have identified a wide range of people's preferences on urban park attributes, such as cleanliness, tranquility, naturalness, or the presence of adequate facilities [22][23][24][25][26]. For instance, in a recent publication, Bertram & Rehdanz [23] summarized visitors' perception of park characteristics in four main groups: naturalness, relating to all characteristics associated with the biodiversity of the urban parks; neatness, including the characteristics that make a park convenient and safe for visits; sociability, relating to the characteristics that are important to meet other people; and spaciousness, which refers to structural characteristics, namely the park size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It includes the research studies focused on the general identification of the population preferences for certain attributes of green spaces and those focused specifically on the identification of the attributes more significantly related to use frequency. These studies have identified a wide range of people's preferences on urban park attributes, such as cleanliness, tranquility, naturalness, or the presence of adequate facilities [22][23][24][25][26]. For instance, in a recent publication, Bertram & Rehdanz [23] summarized visitors' perception of park characteristics in four main groups: naturalness, relating to all characteristics associated with the biodiversity of the urban parks; neatness, including the characteristics that make a park convenient and safe for visits; sociability, relating to the characteristics that are important to meet other people; and spaciousness, which refers to structural characteristics, namely the park size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can be divided into supporting services, e.g., [3,4], regulating services, e.g., [5,6], provisioning services [7] and cultural services, e.g., [8]. The ascendency of urban agriculture over the past 20 or so years has re-introduced cities, and the greenspaces within them, as places that can successfully provide provisioning services (sustenance) to urban residents across the globe, with variation in cultural and geographical contexts [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ecosystem services (ES) are defined as benefits that people obtain directly or indirectly from ecosystems, which are usually classified as provisioning, regulating, or cultural [1][2][3][4]. In this sense, wetlands provide a wide range of ES that contribute to human well-being [5][6][7][8], including algae and fish, ornamental species, natural disaster mitigation, microclimate regulation, aesthetic value, and tourism, among many others [1,9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%