2019
DOI: 10.4300/jgme-d-19-00695.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preference Signaling for Competitive Residency Programs in the NRMP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(12 reference statements)
3
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From their early experiences, the authors reported that fellows’ attitudes towards telemedicine were largely positive, and that 81% of subjects agreed that telemedicine should be required in a one-year ACGME-accredited vascular fellowship. Similar pilot curricula have been developed within medical schools, internal medicine, family medicine, and dermatology residencies, with modest early success [ 14 , 23 – 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From their early experiences, the authors reported that fellows’ attitudes towards telemedicine were largely positive, and that 81% of subjects agreed that telemedicine should be required in a one-year ACGME-accredited vascular fellowship. Similar pilot curricula have been developed within medical schools, internal medicine, family medicine, and dermatology residencies, with modest early success [ 14 , 23 – 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these early advances, implementation of formal telemedicine training is challenged by a diverse array of platforms and technologies and their associated technical difficulties and the lack of standardized physical examination practices [ 14 , 26 , 27 ]. Our results indicate that, while spine surgeons may be as comfortable imparting history-taking skills and evaluation of imaging via telemedicine, the inherent remote nature of the visit creates a unique challenge in teaching orthopaedic/neurologic physical examination maneuvers (Table 3 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, the optimal number of “stars” to afford applicants in such a system remains contentious. 1,53,55,56 Potential drawbacks to this system include applicants being discriminated against for not signaling a program, difficulties coordinating logistics (eg, number of stars) among programs, and certain highly desirable programs receiving a disproportionate amount of “stars.” 1,55,56,58…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ever since the first editorial by Baroody et al 38 in 2008, many proposals regarding the residency selection process have filled the OTO-HNS literature. 1,6,27,29,55,58 The main catalysts for many of the aforementioned proposals have been to control the rising OTO-HNS applicant volume to relieve the difficulties high-applicant volumes create for programs 12,13,38 and discourage students from broadly applying to programs simply to potentially increase their matching chances—which obscures the programs’ abilities to discern true interest among applicants. 1,6 Moreover, as more than half of OTO-HNS programs use USMLE scores as a screening tool, 41 the recently announced change of the USMLE Step 1 examination to pass/fail scoring furthers the need for residency selection reform.…”
Section: Implications For Practicementioning
confidence: 99%