2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-8542-5_46
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preference Selection Index Approach as MADM Method for Ranking of FMS Flexibility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The DEMATEL approach not only converts interdependency associations into a cause-effect cluster using equations but also discovers the critical obstacles of an intricate system of obstacles with the help of an impact association map [64]. Scholars can better use the DEMATEL approach determining the causal interrelationships among the obstacles from within the framework of an issue and explain their conceptual interrelationships, compared with other modeling methods such as ANP, TISM, and GTMA [70]. The steps of the DEMATEL analysis process are presented in Figure 2.…”
Section: Dematelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DEMATEL approach not only converts interdependency associations into a cause-effect cluster using equations but also discovers the critical obstacles of an intricate system of obstacles with the help of an impact association map [64]. Scholars can better use the DEMATEL approach determining the causal interrelationships among the obstacles from within the framework of an issue and explain their conceptual interrelationships, compared with other modeling methods such as ANP, TISM, and GTMA [70]. The steps of the DEMATEL analysis process are presented in Figure 2.…”
Section: Dematelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emerging as one of the simple multi-criteria decisionmaking (MCDM) tools, the Preference Selection Index (PSI) is presented to aid decision-maker that has been applied to many application areas. Among those are concerning on selecting the best plant layout as reported by Sharma and Singhal (2016), determining the best parameters of solar in the work of Nadda et al (2018), manufacturing process optimization decision-Supply chain sustainability risk making by Parizi et al (2017), ranking best composition of composite material as exemplified by Kumar and Kumar (2020), selecting mining contractor by Borujeni and Gitinayard (2017), selecting the best water treatment technologies by Obeidat et al (2021) and ranking of flexibility in flexible manufacturing system (FMS) by Jain et al (2021). Despite its simplicity which is potentially beneficial to SME practitioners, empirical studies in adopting it for supply chain sustainability risk assessment in SME environment are missing in the past references.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2017), ranking best composition of composite material as exemplified by Kumar and Kumar (2020), selecting mining contractor by Borujeni and Gitinayard (2017), selecting the best water treatment technologies by Obeidat et al. (2021) and ranking of flexibility in flexible manufacturing system (FMS) by Jain et al. (2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%